My sister in law works high up in corporate for a California fast food chain. They did have to cut some jobs. At corporate. Boo hoo.
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
557 points (99.3% liked)
News
23160 readers
2831 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Good tell those bums to get a real job.
The infuriating part about this is that I try showing these things to people who claimed 10 years ago that $15 min wage would lead to $35 BIG MACs.
And whenever I try to show them the results, like this, they reply with "I don't remember saying that...."
Then they wonder why I don't talk to them anymore or consider their opinions on anything.
I knew a person who thought if Hillary became president it would lead to WWIII because women in power would upset the world view of men in charge.
I just looked at him and said "So you don't have a fucking CLUE who's in power in other countries then, and remain willfully ignorant on world views."
Now, everytime I have to be around me, he's trying to tell me how in 5 years the U.S. Dollar won't exist. It will be all crypto, because it's decentralized and has no government overreach. Then he said "you can even get it at 7-11 at their ATM."
I just replied "How do you not get punched more often?"
I just replied "How do you not get punched more often?"
I wonder this daily about people.
Oh I've read about this. There was some sort of longitudinal study about like abortion rights or gay rights or something, and people who had shitty views in the past legitimately could not remember that they used to believe that.
It's all about protecting the ego, I think.
I think it was mentioned in this book https://www.davidmcraney.com/howmindschangehome
Gaslighting to protect their ego sounds about right. Funny I still remember all my old cringy positions but they can't seem to bear the damage of admitting they were wrong.
It would be fun for that guy to discover transaction fees and wait times for crypto when he actually tries to pay with it.
Some are extremely quick with fees that amount to basically nothing compared to the current fees for card transactions (that are paid by the stores instead of the customers, so they end up being included in the price of what we're buying, it's just not transparent).
Algorand takes something like 4 seconds to execute a transaction and the fees are about a cent, Nano has no fees and transactions take less than a second...
There's a lot to criticize about Cerrito, but on those points, not all cryptos are Bitcoin or Ethereum!
Heck, even Bitcoin and Ethereum are capable of instant transactions with tiny fees nowadays, thanks to the Lightning network and Layer 2 respectively
How do you not get punched more often?
be the change you want to see
I mean... the fact that the Government cannot really control cryptocurrency is viewed as a downside by quite a large portion of the population.
Are you living in an asylum, or just in USA?
Maybe there's something in the water where you live?
PS: The fact that Trump is a presidential candidate, and has a chance of winning, is evidence that USA as a country suffer a serious mental disease.
The number of politicians in congress that are outright conspiracy theorists and obviously crazy is also evidence for that.
Crazy is the new normal in USA, and I feel really sorry for all the rational even brilliant Americans that have to live in that environment.
Of course some people have mental illnesses, but the badness in politics is largely a result of a corrupt system. We could talk about the electoral college, campaign financing, gerrymandering, capitalism, patriotism, etc., take your pick.
It's not about individual people being morons, although various people are on various topics, including me of course, but rather that we are feeling the effects of systemic problems.
I appreciate yet another opportunity to debunk conservative myths. It's a shame that it's still necessary.
You have entire rest of the world, almost 8 billion people outside of US... Yet somehow this is different?
Because they already run at minimum staff and charge the most they think you'll pay?
Seriously. Why even bother having two separate windows, if the person taking the order, collecting money, and giving you the order are all the same people?
Also, how is it possible that a high quality pub burger with fries and a coke are cheaper than any meal they offer?
Seriously. Still astounds me that most everyone I know orders Domino's in a town full of cheap local places that deliver.
It's almost as if we have this argument every few years for the last two centuries. Minimum wage increases do not increase the price of goods.
The argument isn't about the facts. It's about "I'm inventing a reason to hate seeing people of low status get more status, because my worth is based on comparing myself to them."
The reason why so many humans hate progress is because they think that it reduces their own standing.
And even when they do, it's minimal and the increase is more than offset by the wage increase.
But WaGe-pRiCe sPiRaL!!!
That's so weird. It's almost as if the majority of the money people pay for fast food is going to something other than workers' paychecks. It's also almost as if the price increases from "inflation" were lies because there seems to be plenty of margin.
B-b-b-but the armchair common sense economists swore it would! And they use “anyone can see” logic!
Well, given time, prices will move to where the businesses make the most profit. If relationship between price and demand is linear, then an increase in expenses will move the ideal price point by half as much.
The people that thought it would raise prices are the same people that either can't read, or would refuse to read anything called a "study".
Assuming a linear relationship between price and demand, then if you increase the cost of product, the price where the most profit is generated moves by half of this amount.
That's because price points exist. People will only pay so much for fast food.
Turns out wage increases don't affect prices, just like the research has shown.
Didn’t fast food prices increase something like 30% though? At least in my area I remember mcchickens being way cheaper a few years ago
Yes, but that happened way before the minimum wage hike hit, and was not limited to California. So it's unrelated.
Ahh. Alright
McDonalds and a lot of the other big chains have went up drastically nationwide. It has nothing to do with the CA wage hike.
Sure, but I think the point is that raising minimum wage didn't cause that. Inflation (read: corporate greed) really harmed grocery, food, etc. prices, especially during the pandemic. It truly became a game of how much can we raise these prices until people consider not paying for it
The game is still afoot as far as I can see.
I mean, that’s always the game in sales.
Prices went up before anything even was voted on.