this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
280 points (96.7% liked)

4chan

4218 readers
184 users here now

Greentexts, memes, everything 4chan.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

this individual i spotted’s face

what lol

[–] [email protected] 126 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So "'s" is what's called a "clitic". It's a tiny little piece of meaning that can't stand by itself and has to "lean" on a neighboring thing to be grammatical.

The interesting thing is that their distribution is syntactic, not morphological. So, instead of attaching to a word, like affixes do, "'s" instead attaches to entire noun phrases. This includes all adjectives, prepositional phrases, and even subordinate clauses, as long as they're part of the possessor noun phrase.

So, "the dude's car"? Perfectly fine, and it even looks like an affix here. "The dude over there's car"? Perfectly fine. "The dude I went to school with but who forgot that he ate a capybara yesterday's car"? Perfectly grammatical in English thanks to the power of clitics.

Bonus fun fact: "'s" used to actually be a suffix, but somehow became separated over time, and it's a big deal in diachronic syntactic theory, because things are only ever supposed to evolve toward being a suffix, but "'s" is one of the few things that seems like it evolved the other way, which throws a wrench into how we usually view the process (called "grammaticalization").

In short, Anon's sentence is a perfectly cromulent use of the English language.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Where is the subscribe button for more linguistics facts?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pretty interesting read for a non native speaker, i got to say. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Pretty interesting read for a native speaker, even.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You can also think of the phrase as replacing the name of the subject of the sentence that we're trying to say has possession of something. Like a pronoun. So,

this individual I spotted's face

Could be better conceptualized as:

"this individual I spotted" + 's face, or "his" face

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Thats actually a good help for me as a german because some people do talk like that. They would say something like "That is peter his car" Instead of "That is peter's car" (But in german you would skip the ' )

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was under the impression that such a phrase should be hyphenated in order to use the clitic with it, such as "the-individual-I-spotted's face".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Possibly - I wouldn't really know. Writing isn't language, and written English's "rules" are subjective and largely arbitrary, so I don't worry about them very much.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh man, what will be the Fediverse's Mission Accomplished moment? I'm thinking inaccurate targeting of one or more CEOs in a smear campaign. I think that's on brand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

We've already been doing that...

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is... is that ralphthemoviemaker?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

ralphthemurdermaker

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool ! It's been 3 years, did it work?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

He's been caught, trial set for 2024. Surprise, he looks nothing like the pictures in this post.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Where does that "the eyes of a psychopathic killer" diagram on the right come from?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago