If we can work out which data conduits are patrolled more often by AI than by humans, we could intentionally flood those channels with AI content, and push Model Collapse along further. Get AI authors to not only vet for "true human content", but also pay licensing fees for the use of that content. And then, hopefully, give the fuck up on their whole endeavor.
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
444 points (94.2% liked)
Technology
59398 readers
2541 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I for one support the AI centipede and hope it shits into it's own input until it dies
Oh no . .
Anyway
Well duh. I think a lot of us here learned that lesson from watching the movie Multiplicity.
Would you recommend it?
Oh, shit. Ummm...it was a funny movie back when it came out, but I haven't seen it in like 25 years so who knows how bad it seems now. Could still be good?
Two outcasts among their peers, Gary Wallace and Wyatt Donnelly spent a good deal of their youth as pioneers and early adopters of AI.
Lol
I couldn't care less.
I really don't get how people so easily accept this. This is an engineering problem, not a law of the universe... How would someone possibly prove something is impossible, particularly while the entire branch of technology is rapidly changing?