this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
119 points (84.0% liked)

Funny

6894 readers
500 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 137 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Top: map of where people don't live

Bottom: map of where people live

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Getting shot by a redneck or getting probed by Elvis, take your pick.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I bet that second map would look dramatically different if it was sightings per capita.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also how many are repeat callers.

"Hey Bert, Old Man Jenkins called in another Santa Clause, do you have eyes on a plane around the airport?"

"Sure do, Tina. Small single engine is making it's approach now."

"okay thanks. I'll give you another ring when he calls in for the 243rd time this year..."

Back when I was a teenager in church, some of the local cops would be talking shit about the "crazies" they would arrest, and apparently one guy would call in about UFOs every time the nearest air force base used the training airspace that was overhead. Multiple times a week, and I guess never listened that it wasn't aliens.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

these aliens sure are advanced, they even replicate our technology to blend in!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

The top is the percentage of people while the bottom is the total incidence. This is an apples and oranges comparison. In this case the bottom map is functionally a population map as others have pointed out. Most stats are best in "#/thousand people" or equivalent, but should always in the same unit if compared.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where is this top map from? I can't say for the rest of the states, but oregon and Washington are way off. WA has 34% gun ownership and OR has 44%

Source: https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/gun-ownership.html

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It might be per household vs. people with a firearm registered to them personally? (Note i have no idea how firearm registration works in thr US but it's the first explanation that comes to mind since your source is specifically "adults living in a household with at least one firearm")

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where is the correlation? South Carolina? Some in Arizona? Is the point that there’s more UFO sightings in places with low gun ownership? Please explain.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the joke is that aliens might be scared of the gun places.

(Reality is just that the % is higher in rural areas, and more people = more sightings)