this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
433 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Andrew McCabe says Trump-Putin interactions ‘raise questions’, as Harris says Putin would eat Trump ‘for lunch’

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago

That's a very G- rated way of Putin it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

He’s facing the wrong way and he would be lower, puckering at Putin’s personal ‘mic’.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Just for shits and giggles, let's say he is, and the absolute fact of it comes to light. Then what? Is that war on Russia? They infiltrated the highest office of our country and attempted to overthrow the government. That's war, right? You can't just sanction that away.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

To be perfectly blunt: yes, but not “war” in the traditional sense as most think about it.

It’s war in the sense that Russia is currently waging against the US and the EU, which is a much broader context than traditional military conflict. So: NSA, CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, DGSE (France), AW (Poland), (n.b. Germany conspicuously absent, as they’ve allowed an LOT of Russian influence to get into their institutions in a LOT of places, and that is going to take a while to root out) etc. take the gloves off, as the FSB has been doing for literal decades. If they want to fuck around and pull the “little green men” bullshit on NATO territory, help them find out what happens by responding to any incursions of that variety with a division or six of armored cav lined up on the borders. Massive increases in air defense; likewise for marine and submarine threats - specifically, figuring out and catching up to very interesting and surprisingly capable non-acoustic submarine detection and tracking technologies that the Soviets devised later in the Cold War, and that the Russians continue to use and refine.

More simply: this is the Cold War 2, right now, today. We’re in it. We need to fucking act like it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Info Wars.

Yeah, I know. It’s annoying that anything about that is right.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Let's start with booting them out of Ukraine so they don't obtain more power and resources to continue spreading this fuckery and enabling their war machine. Should be doing it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Even if he came right out and admitted it on national television there is not a damn thing that would happen. All the republicans would try to justify that’s it fine and not a big deal, 40% of the population would welcome our new Russian overlords, and nobody in the DOJ wouldn’t be bothered to actually prosecute anything. I have lost all faith in this country to hold anyone accountable for anything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Why don’t we start with the guy who orchestrated a coup attempt? From there to his organization that perpetrated it.

Then we start undoing all the judicial appointments. russia’s not going anywhere but down anyway. They’ll wait.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They infiltrated the highest office of our country and attempted to overthrow the government. That’s war, right?

considering how many times we've actually overthrown peoples governments to our own ends, turnabout would just be fair play - least we better hope it's not something people will go to war over because there's a long list of potential enemies

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

By no means do I want to diminish the historical wrongheadedness of the US, but using that as a justification for letting Russia just have at it without any response is just categorically asinine.

We’re already in the Second Cold War. It’s here now.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

Part of not being blind to your own jingoism is understanding how your actions affect others- I'm not saying that it's OK to coup or attempt to undermine governments with media operations, I'm saying that if we're going to act like this is suddenly some sort of mortal sin after decades of doing that ourselves, people aren't going to take it seriously. It's certainly not going to make outside observers think that we're a reasonable actor who's simply under attack by authoritarians. Purely for riling up the base.