this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
583 points (97.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
3067 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 months ago (2 children)

it's still amazing to me that any military personnel still support trump after all the times he shat on the military

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Racism and guns are more important to them than respect for the military, even if they are that military

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

People in the military aren’t the sharpest group.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Ehh, it depends. Polling in 2020 put soldiers at 41℅ Dems/ 37% Republicans, so it's not fully one way or the other.

From my personal experience, soliders mainly were non voting. After service? Tended to matter where they ended up more than anything else.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

This was my experience in the army as well. It was a grab bag of opinions because soldiers come from every part of the country and every walk of life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'd argue that's only to get more one-sided as military benefits get cut down further and further. GI bill and medical benefits are huge draws for people, it's a way out of genuinely shit situations. Hack away too far and people stop signing up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, and Dems fund the VA and education benefits while the repubs fund contractors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are benefits getting cut? Honestly. All I ever hear is about trying to get more health coverage, fix the VA, and nearly $1T annual budget.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It gets repeatedly threatened; transgender people using medical benefits for affirming surgeries were kicked out under trump IIRC; it wouldn't surprise me if pregnancy related care (and othe reproductive healthcare such as vasectomies, histerectomies, tubal litigation, etc) also gets axed under a potential trump presidency.

Education benefits are a sticky one. I genuinely think cutting that would lead to revolt if medical benefits don't. That's a huge draw. It gets some people out of a shit situation, and gives them an education to get a good job to avoid going back into that situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I somehow forgot that the military loses the same freedoms and benefits that we all lose under GOP (religious extremists, deranged fascists, etc).

It's ironic that free/subsidized healthcare and education, basic pillars of society that all Americans should enjoy (like most civilized countries), is instead used as some amazing military benefit. I guess we all just need to join the military! I can't imagine who would even consider joining without these, at least for a generation or two (until forgotten). But as you said, healthcare especially is already being chipped away for many people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its probably the only institution of the US that the poem inscribed on the statue of liberty actually applies to.

Most people outside of that description are drawn in by nationalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

All I ever hear is about trying to get more health coverage, fix the VA, and nearly $1T annual budget.

i wonder why they want to do that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My understanding was that officers tend to lean more left, while enlisted men lean right.

Which makes sense when you think about relative education.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In general yeah, but the numbers have shifted pretty hard. In 2016, it was 55/45 gop to dem.

Just 4 years later, it shift to 41/37 dem to gop. Looks like a decent chunk went non voting, but it did shift the needle.

While I was in the service, it was majority conservative, but lots of people from lots of places tends to shift that. You get to know people from all over the country, break down biases and learn new things. Looks like nowadays there isn't that overarching conservative energy on top. Probably a better military to be in now, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yikes, imagine being in the military and choosing not to vote. That's kind of unbelievable (rhetorically speaking... unfortunately, its all too believable).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Military people are a cross-section of Americans at large, not a single bloc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I only have responses that would be derogatory and biased against the military in general. And while I think one could apply your statement to most groups of people in any context, you do have a point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Recognizing your bias is remarkable and worth these upvotes!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

They're the sharpest bulbs in the shed

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Neither are people that make generalized statements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds pretty generalized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s not intolerant to be intolerant of intolerance. I thought this was settled a few years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

its not, but the joke applies here, and also it is a good rule of thumb, never make blanket statements unless you're either shitposting or joking.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

Intolerance is relative. I don’t tolerate the intolerance of the military. So by your definition, I am not intolerant. That is unless you don’t tolerate my non-intolerance of intolerance. 💋

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago

The true travesty isn't that he did it, it's that he was allowed to get away with it like he always is.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I'm not a "Support the Troops" person. I even have family in the military, I just really don't care for that jingoism. So I'm not that offended by Trump's antics disrespecting the military.

What really frustrates me is the fact orange man thought it was a good idea to THUMBS UP in a graveyard. Jesus Christ, no respect for the dead. And every single person around this idiot is cool with him doing that. Fucking ghouls.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't respect anyone, so this isn't a surprise. That some people wanted or still want him in a service position to the country when all he cares about is one person named DJT is beyond me. If the previous term didn't show them that, they won't ever get it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It's because he was "hurting the right people." They have accepted that their lives will be miserable, and will do everything they can to make sure no person of color, or minority of any type, has it better than them. That's the most important part to them.

It's not even about whether or not the government can do good for all its people, that's not even a possibility to them. So instead, they see it as a means of making other people more miserable than them, and pulling the ladder up behind them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Meh. I don't care about the thumbs up.

What sickens me is that they planned this. They strategised how to get in there with the cameras, and how to respond to the inevitable outcry that would follow.

Their statements in the immediate aftermath are vulgar. The comment about an employee who was suffering a mental health episode trying to stop them. I imagine that employee was upset at seeing the sacrilegious trampling of the dignity of the fallen soldiers in her care.

It's also not lost on me that if anyone thought for a second that any political campaign would be so low as to try this, there would be security in place to prevent it. These scum are willing to stoop that low.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you mean with the military overall, but I personally find the THUMBS UP to be more egregious when those buried there died in service to our country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Did they do? Maybe in service to your politicians but certainly not in service to "the country"

I dont like valuing people and their deaths like this, but basically any teacher or nurse has done a hundred times more for your country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They died in service to their country, most of the teachers and nurses did not. Some of those wars were even just.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also I want to add even if you believe that those soldiers were victims of propaganda, they believed they were serving the country. They believed they were serving their fellow man. That counts in my book.

I lay the blame for why they died at the feet of the men and women responsible for their deployments, not at the feet of those who died believing in something bigger than themselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

they believed they were serving the country. They believed they were serving their fellow man. That counts in my book.

Well said

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, we know. We didn't need the apparently unnamed son of John McCain to tell us that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

His name is Jimmy. First paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The author could at least directly name them in the title. If it's significant enough to write an article about, maybe name the guy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

It's only important because he is John McCain's son. Other people have spoken out and it was less news worthy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

We all clicked on the post didn’t we?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No but there's a few more tidbits in the article like Jimmy McCain voting for Harris and the "ever-so-relevant" Meghan McCain:

Despite her harsh criticisms of Trump, Meghan McCain indicated last week that she would still not endorse Harris. “I’m a lifelong, generational conservative,” she tweeted.

I get your sentiment though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

“I’m a lifelong, generational conservative,” she tweeted.

men, and women, and fellows in between, this is what we call a red flag.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

The post title is actually a link to an article.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Just saw John McCain's grave at Annapolis on the same day we went to Arlington. Got a private tour of the highest ranked graves. Most incredible thing? He's only buried there bc his best friend, a fellow naval officer, vouched for him and pulled strings to have him buried there.

It was so dope. I'm the only civilian to have accurately pointed at a headstone and said "isn't that the dude who blew up a train bridge inland, defying the jurisdiction of the navy??"

Yes, Lefty's love America and are actual Patriots.

Sauce: 1000129405

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Well, he's not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, no shit. Though thanks for reminding me John McCain is dead

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The true travesty isn't that he did it, it's that he was allowed to get away with it, like he always is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

judging by the outcry. i'm not sure about that, although i wonder why military twitter thinks about this one, they were mad about tim walz and his whole spiel that one time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Decries, slams, rips, fires... over sensationalized headlines don't come from real journalists. Let the facts speak.