this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3732 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is absolutely insane and needs more attention.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This shit'll never happen.

What happened to the sentencing for his guilty felony trial?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think it is Sept 18th so a few weeks. It's taken way to long, but ideally there is no good answer. He should be in prison for many of his actions. The only reason I think the supreme fraud voted for them being immune for actions during office is that they know they couldn't argue his actions he was impeached for wouldn't be direct evidence of subverting the results of an election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thank you. Yeah I agree. I didn't have time yesterday to look it up. I don't know how I missed this. It looks like this shit will never happen either...

Trump was scheduled to be sentenced on July 11. Judge Juan Merchan said the former president will now be sentenced on September 18, “if such is still necessary.”

The announcement underscores the far-reaching implications of Monday’s Supreme Court ruling, in which the court’s conservative wing found that presidents have absolute immunity for “core” presidential duties.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As much as this dirbag deserves to rot in a cell I'll be shocked if he ever does. I lost all hope in this piece of shit seeing justice when he was acquitted for a second time by the Senate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As is tradition. Punishment for crime in the US is for the poor. You can bet if I took that many boxes of documents and even classified materials home I'd be in prison within the year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Simply defy the court's instructions to not threaten staff and witnesses or their families. You would be jailed before you could finish blinking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Hey now, maybe not! Didn't sell yourself short - if you were able to get into the same building as those docs you'd probably be wealthy enough to avoid fancy lawyers too!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why does this "need more attention"? After Cannon dismissed, it was pretty obvious to anyone paying attention (and was regularly mentioned in coverage of the dismissal) that it wouldn't get litigated until after the election--if at all, since if Trump wins the election he'll have the justice department drop the case.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apparently you didn't read. He's trying to get this jumped to people in his Kangaroo Courts, then get it elevated to the Supreme Court whom he thinks will save his ass.

That's why it needs more attention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

None of this is surprising or new. It's just a description of the methods of delay. That's literally the thesis of the article: Trump is trying to delay until after the election, and the government's filings indicate they aren't trying to fight that timeline, so Trump was successful.

It was already "jumped" to a friendly court (Cannon), which is why and how it was dismissed for such bizarre reasons. And it is the prosecution of a former president. It was always going to be appealed to SCOTUS. None of this is new. And none of that will matter if Trump is elected.

"Delay until after the election" has been Trump's strategy for this case since it started.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Merrick Garland is a traitor. He should be treated as such.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He waited 2.5 years before doing jack shit. He's a conservative who was trying to let Trump slide until Congress put pressure on him to actually do something. He's a fucking traitor, just like every other conservative in our government.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's quite an interpretation. Prosecutions for Jan 6th started pretty immediately after he was put in his post, and that whole prosecuting a former President for crimes took some time and investigation to work out. It was stalled from day one by the courts, remember? Garland seems to have done his job just fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Interpretation? It's a fact. He famously did not begin investigating Trump for over 2 years and only began after congress publicly implored him to. If he began investigating Trump at an appropriate time, we might have seen justice for the leader of the insurrection before the upcoming elections. This is not an "interpretation". This is a fact.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

As was before will be so today, and will remain being so tomorrow. Until the opposite is proven to me I will keep assuming that Trump will continue to get away with everything forever.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/president-donald-trump-election-interference-2669107229/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support