By forcing the town to endure something they clearly and repeatedly rejected, it’s sort of like Starbucks is molesting the town with an unwanted incursion. Maybe they could forgo store #798,463,299
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)
World News
32323 readers
836 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
If the locals - as a whole, not just some prominent extremists - dislike Starbucks being there, then the location will fail.
Not true. Locations can survive on commuters.
If every single local tells you to gtfo and applauds the arsonists, its time to go. You're an anti-gun corporation, not a heavilly armed black family with a right to live wherever they please ... and I'm only not telling that family they should listen to anyone about anything because its not my place.
That's right, the gun thing's a red herring for once, but the strongly-worded advice stands.
Burrrrrrrrrn, baby, burn!