this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1936 points (98.4% liked)

memes

9672 readers
2724 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Gotta be honest, I have been hearing about this but have no idea what the deal is. Can someone enlighten me?

Edit: Nm I should just actually read the comments.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

As someone who did a trial Disney plus 4 years ago, is that TOS still valid if they came and murdered me in their restaurant?

I'm legit asking.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The mouse can now can legally assassinate you in your sleep.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean you didn't fully read the TOS?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

I just copy and paste their TOS and ask ChatGPT and according to it, even if I'm no longer a subscriber, they can still enforce arbitration.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

If you're asking whether the binding arbitration clause would apply to the murder case, then no. Homicide falls under criminal law, where the state is the plaintiff. The state didn't enter an agreement under the TOS. I suppose Disney could try to argue it applies if your legal estate filed a civil suit; in the real case it argued that the arbitration clause applied because the husband (who'd agreed to it) filed a civil suit as the plaintiff.

Instead, Disney would get away with it the old-fashioned way: because it's a rich corporation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's exactly what happened here. So the result of this suit will be your answer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Disney thought they were doing the ol anime glasses push moment. They didn't realize they were actually granny from squidbillies.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All the dude asked for was $50,000. I'm sure the reputational damage was totally worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Lock your doors if you ever had Disney plus! 😱😱😱

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure that Disney can't outright kill anyone unless they came out of a Disney pod gasping and crying, "what am I?" to the universe before being given their prime corporate directive of being a kid's movie star, but I'm not a lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

All publicity is good publicity

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›