Afaik the X11 standard says that this shouldn't be done and that workspaces should span all monitors (or something along the lines of that), thus most DEs don't do this (I've read this in the gnome issue tracker), don't ask me why cause I also hate this behaviour. Most window managers will do that however and luckily it's super easy to replace xfwm with another window manager. I use i3 inside xfce on my work laptop, this guide describes how to set it up with ease
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
18 points (84.6% liked)
Linux
47341 readers
1380 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
👍 ty
Isn't the whole workspace thing simply a software way to have multiple monitors into one which you can "look at" when you switch?
That's sort of how herbstluftwm models it. Workspaces are called tags, and are areas windows can be arranged. Monitors are like SVG viewports, with dimensions; Herbst auto-manages physical monitors, but lets you define virtual monitors with arbitrary dimensions. Workspaces (tags) are displayed on monitors and windows are adjusted to the dimensions of the monitors as tags are moved around. Monitors can be overlayed... the terminology is counterintuitive (windows have tags, but can only have one tag at a time, and monitors can overlap, etc), but it's a really nice way of approaching things IMO, and is one of the main reasons I'm sticking with X.
Do you mean you want separate sets of workspaces on each monitor and to be able to switch through them independently? Just having "workspace 1 on monitor 1 and workspace 2 on monitor 2" sounds no different than the default behaviour with no extra workspaces.
In i3wm/swaywm, hyprland, ... You can assign workspaces to outputs (monitors)
👍
SwayWM, but I think any of those you mentioned should be able to do it?
I think maybe Enlightenment can do that, but I'm not sure.
Normally workspace definitions are systemwide not monitor specific. A workspace uses all monitors on the system.
AwesomeWM should allow switching workspaces independently if you want to try a dynamic tiler
👍
Gnome 3 has an option to keep one display fixed when changing workspaces... Also most window managers allow you to keep certain windows on all workspaces, maybe that will help?
👍
What's the workspace give you? A bare task bar?
KISS: Plug workstation 1 into monitor 1 and workstation 2 into monitor 2. Then use something like Synergy to share the keyboard and mouse between the computers.
Workspace is not the same as Workstation....
For you and I, yes I agree there is a difference. For OP, who has not replied to any comment, maybe not.
haha I like to wait for more replies before I start to comment. tx 4 input.