this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
159 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

11842 readers
161 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It seems like the headline is deliberately written to be funny (I did get a good laugh out of it) and the actual event isn't quite as nottheoniony. My understanding is that the court faced the question of whether the lawsuit could proceed against the doctor individually, or against the insurance company. It's bizzare but rather unsurprising and understandable that the lawyers of a doctor faced with such a claim would try, even if it's likely to fail, to have it pushed via the insurance company.

The court made the right decision of course, but this just seems like business as usual for lawsuits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Its a bit worse than that, as I understand it.

It would have to be proven as medical malpractice, which would be much harder. It was a legal ploy to avoid any consequences.

Note that this is based on my layman understanding and other articles I've read on this, as well as comments from a few people in the medical industry I know (doctor, two nurses, and a friend in biotech).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Utah = bad or whatever

There's only so much a court can do in the face of a hostile and unrepresentative legislature, but to its credit, Utah's supreme court has refused to let a near total abortion ban take effect, and just in the last day they slapped down the legislature's attempt to gerrymander the state against the will of the people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Believe it or not, even with almost all the power in the state held by the Mormons, with some of their crazy beliefs, Utah actually has a lot of sensible legislation on the books and regularly makes common sense rulings easily.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah but they only did that so the insurance wouldn't have to cover it