What is sensitive about these details? The NYT cutout in the link lists deliveries after they've been made, so how would they be intercepted?
this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
Ukraine
8227 readers
768 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.
Haha, This commentary is paranoid nonsense. Intercept deliveries after they're made? Russia now has time travel? Locations named like 'Poland', 'Spain'? Oh wow, thats some serious location giveaway. If the war is going bad, don't make excuses for hypothetical security concerns which somehow got past the US govt and Pentagon from a newspaper?? If anything focus on who caused the delays for those weapons to arrive which is an actual issue, no time travel need.
yes, nyt is shit. however it's important we ask ourselves questions:
- where did they get this info?
- how sensitive are this info anyway? aren't they available to public?
also, i got blocked by the site. do they have the article in question in there?
None of this is 'sensitive information'. Its not as though the nyt got some scoop about weapon deliveries and against US gov wishes printed it.
Considering that NYT is liberal, often the target of conservatives and republicans. And that it has been many conservatives and republicans who seem to practically be rooting for Putin. Conservatives and republicans who caused the delay for funding Ukraine, this whole piece seems off the mark and somewhat paranoid.