Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
hilarious that vance wrote an entire book blaming poor mountain people for causing their own problems and not bootstraps-ing themselves out of despair (like he did, naturally), and is now saying that biden's america is 100% to blame for those exact same problems
not to mention all the gigabytes of trash he's talked about trump, whose asshole vance is now slurping with the gusto of a dog in a steak factory
whose asshole vance is now slurping with the gusto of a dog in a steak factory
😆 It's only 0600 here. I'm gonna call it a day after reading that so that I can end on a high note.
James Donald Bowman is his birth name. Tired of this ‘woke’ changing names agenda!
So where does the Vance part come in? Sounds like he wants to be an edgy pop guitar solo artist.
Wait.. so the Republican ticket is James Donald and Donald John? Those fucking nerds.
What if we combine them? James Donald John TRANce. Think that’ll bring out more GOP voters?
I'm up for combining them, but only if it's in some sort of weird human-centipede situation.
I mean, his last VP pick had lightning powers. This one fucks couches. That's a hell of a downgrade.
lightning powers? I'm ootl
Really feels like Vance is being set up as the fall guy to blame when trump loses.
"If he had just picked someone else as VP, he would've won!" -conservatives in five months
Really feels like Vance is being set up as the fall guy to blame when trump loses.
He was the bag man for Cryptobros. Trump puts him on the ticket and the money flows into the Trump campaign.
Now it's looking like a raw deal, as Trump has to spend all that new money defending his hideous little troll of a VP.
“If he had just picked someone else as VP, he would’ve won!” -conservatives in five months
Missed a perfectly good opportunity to run a horny VP like Kristi Noem or Laura Boebert or Hope Hicks.
Still would have lost, but at least we wouldn't need Vance's mug all over the TV.
"Vance does worse in his home region at -16 points than he does in the average of all polls… So the people who know him best, the region that knows him best, they like him even less than America likes him.”
— Polling analyst Harry Enten, on CNN
Plus, betting markets have opened up on if he'll be retained on the ticket.
Noooo we spent so much time and money messaging against him! That’s not fair!111!!
Memers should be reimbursed.
So how many Scaramucci's to each Vance?
2 Trusses tops
I like him better than I like Trump, but then I want them to lose. I would vote for the corpse of Richard Nixon before I considered voting for either of them.
Plus, betting markets have opened up on if he’ll be retained on the ticket.
I'm not a betting man but I pretty much came to the comments to see if anyone else thought this too. "We" showed it's "ok" to drop out this close to the election so I 100% believe they're going to do the same with him and they can just have fox news say "the Democrats already did it so we're doing it to get back at them!" because if there's one thing maga loves more than beating up on (insert non cis/white/male people) it's revenge.
Actually makes me wonder whether they'll try to pressure Trump to quit, for these same reasons.
I mean, he definitely won't quit, but they might try.
Let's not jump to conclusions until we get the couche's side of the story.
Would that cushion the blow?
It ought to man.
So far, soooo good.
I guess I'm dumb or ignorant, but what's the reference here?
Edit: nevermind, explained further down the thread
Ahem, they ended up pulling that article... presumably because he actually did have sex with a couch.
They pulled it because they can't actually know if he did or didn't. Good to see some journalistic integrity! Lol
Can't prove a negative!
Many people are saying that JD did NOT fuck that couch. But then, many people are asking....I don't know, were you THERE?
🤣
Poor JD, his grandma really did hate him for being a burdensome piece of shit.
