this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43896 readers
1010 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Smoking. Millions of euros of taxpayer money spent every year on those lung cancer patients which could be well spent elsewhere. It's also an activity that negatively affects not just the smoker but everyone around them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Smoking is something I truly despise, we all know that it is bad, really bad for you, we teach kids about it, yet people still start smoking.

Do as New Zealand did, set a cut off year, if you are born after 2015, you will not be permitted to buy tobacco at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Great. You've just made another illegal narcotic, a black market and a way of financing illegal activity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i hate tobacco but prohibition doesnt work.

we should have learned that lesson with alcohol and weed but it seems we did not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I'd qualify that as for-profit mandatory insurance.

Canpt get a mortgage without home insurance. Canpt drive a vehicle without at least liability. Those rates should be strictly government regulated to be sustainable and non-profit.

But if you want to insure your collection if priceless Whitworth wrenches, well maybe I care a bit (Just a bit!) less about insurance gouging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The selling of personal information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Unlimited campaign finance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Boneless chicken with bones

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

u want to outlaw chickens ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A throwaway reference to another thread on here …. Someone tried to sue a restaurant when he choked on a bone in his boneless chicken wings. The court ruled he can’t sue because β€œboneless” is just a style of cooking and doesn’t make any claim about whether that meal has bones. …. That kind of misrepresentation, and dodging responsibility should be illegal. All sorts of scamming the customer should be illegal and isn’t

If I can go on a bit of a rant, I do believe in the power of the market to shape our lives, our economy, our society. Conservatives got that part right. But a market is only β€œfree” when everyone plays by the same rules and has same facts and knowledge, free choice. A market is only beneficial when it is shaped by regulators to benefit society. A market is only sustainable when it incorporates externalities. If Conservatives are gung ho about free markets, they need to step up and do their part. While there’s a nice theory about the usefulness of Marketting, the primary use is to lie, subvert, fool, distort the market, and THAT should be illegal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Requiring the purchase or use of proprietary software or formats to view or submit public records.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Or medical. Or educational.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Billionaires. Nobody ever needs that much wealth. Resources better used elsewhere for the public good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

In the US slavery should be illegal since ages but isn't yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Making a profit from healthcare and health insurance.

Or even just make private health insurance illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Members of Congress trading individual stocks, bonds, and other investments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Rich people and cops breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

They should make it illegal to break the law

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Surprised to see no one has said cigarettes yet. Not only are you poisoning yourself, it's harmful to everyone else around you that has to inhale that shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the same vein, driving gas cars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I would vastly prefer that gas cars be phased out. But I believe that this is a bit different:

Cigarettes don't offer any benefit beyond making you "feel good." And you don't need cigarettes to feel good, and, in fact, literally any other option is better for both you, and everyone around you, save for harder drugs.

Gasoline cars, while poisonous to the world around us, also offer us far greater benefits: supplies and logistics, we can carry goods further, wider, and faster than we ever could without them. And because of that, without them, sure we'd pollute a lot less, but then we'd have a far harder time carrying critical resources to more remote parts of the world where trains and planes can't reach, and people would starve or lack critical medicine.

As it stands, EVs are not a reliable substitute. They're getting there, I want them to get there, but I disagree with the notion that cars should be made illegal as things currently stand. I don't think it's nearly as cut and dry as cigarettes are. I can only hope to live long enough to see a world where gas powered cars could be outlawed without leaving hundreds of millions of people high and dry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

non-consensual advertising (consensual being things like steam discovery queue, where I actively want to be advertised to), "lobbying" (bribing), fossil fuels and friends, gerrymandering (US), the electoral college (US), publically trading your company

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Collection of personally identifiable information on every website ever.

Corporate murder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Supermarkets and businesses throwing food away and not allowing people to take it for free. ("If I can't sell it nobody can have it").

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Would only work if you also made them immune from lawsuits due to people getting sick from eating expired food.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

they already are under the good samaritan laws; they use lawsuits as an excuse for their shitty behavior.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί