this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5695 readers
1422 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they will find a way to look good on paper while still doing more harm than good

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They'll all buy credits, problem solved!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

They'd still do more harm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bet they're too dumb and poor to even know how to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Only people with really big penises and lots of money know how to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Oh, well...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They can't even remove micro plastics from the environment and even my peasant testicles can do that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

But then the line might go up more slowly for a while! Everything must be sacrificed to the line!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Step 1 - Take carbon from atmosphere

Step 2 - Compress carbon into diamonds

Step 3 - ???

Step 4 - Profit!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Swap steps 1 and 3.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is a company trying to do this.

It’s very stupid.

Carbon capture in general is stupid.

First law of thermodynamics: energy cannot be created or destroyed.

In a perfect world with 100% efficient capture, it would take just as much energy to remove the carbon as it took to put it there in the first place, so if we just wanted to offset what we put into the atmosphere this year, we’d have to double the total global energy production. If we wanted to start putting a dent into “legacy carbon” we’d have to start generating more than twice the energy we use. Half that new energy infrastructure would have to go towards extracting carbon, so even though we’ve double the supply of electricity, electric costs would likely skyrocket, as electric companies now have to pay to maintain an entirely separate grid that only carbon capture facilities are using.

So unless every government in the world wants to cripple their economies for decades by forking over trillions of dollars to double the scale of their energy production, it’s never going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You do realize we have an unlimited energy source burning down on us during the day? Energy isn't the issue here. We already overproduce during the day (though electric cars might take the load off of that in the near future).

Also you don't have to make the carbon go poof, you just have to capture it and store in in another form (that's not in the atmosphere). So yes, if you have a way to capture it and you use solar power (or any other renewable) you can reduce the carbon in the air.

Earth isn't a closed system.