this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
140 points (87.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35735 readers
969 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Given that racists and slavers used the "natural physical strength" of black people to justify putting them on hard labor and some medics still think that blacks has higher resistance to pain, I wonder if when black athletes started to join mixed race sport teams, some racist would have used the same "biological advantage" argument that now transphobes use against trans athletes to claim it was "unfair" for black to compete against whites to justify segregation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (7 children)

For a while there was a persistent myth that black people had an extra muscle in their leg that allowed them to perform better at sports.

It's kind of similar to phrenology in trying to justify racism.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While there is no extra muscle, it is factually true that people of West African descent tend to have more fast twitch muscle fibers which is a pretty big advantage in many sports.

This is likely why the myth of the extra muscle originated.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that really true though? Many of these sports myths hold true until they suddenly don't. Tall people were believed to be awful sprinters until Usain Bolt somehow just smashed everyone. Koreans nerds were the supposed chosen SC2 players but now it's a chad from Italy

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This was taught to me in grade school. I feel pretty betrayed.

Suffice it to say, I found it dubious even as a child and as an adult, learned better, but WTF.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Was it one teacher or multiple? I live in a fairly progressive US state, but I definitely had a one or two backwards teachers with axes to grind.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I remember my friend's mom telling me this when I was like 6 and then I told my mom what I learned and she told me not to listen to that lady.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

My dad told me as a kid black folks have more fast-twitch muscle fibers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Northern Europe perspective: This was a minor but ongoing part of public discourse until well into the 90s, to my recollection.

It didn't take real root, and my theory of that is that our racists are generally fascists who consider physical strength and fitness to be high values. Intellect and arts are for weaklings. Going into detail on how the Africans had an advantage on speed, strength and agility but were still somehow inferior required too much mental gymnastics.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago

Classic fascist narrative: The enemy is both strong and dangerous, and weak and dumb.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Possibly, though the difference in strength and endurance between a male and female is much, much larger than between two different races. Male high school athletes outperform Olympic medal winning female athletes in almost every category. The difference is stark.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One time the kkk created a baseball team and lost to a all black team. I bet some of the kkk members were saying shit like that afterwards lol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Have you ever tried to steal a base in a full length robe?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There was an NFL commentator named Jimmy the Greek who said something like "they are bred to be a better athlete" on air. He was fired shortly thereafter. Can't remember when it happened though, maybe the mid 1980's. Not sure if he himself was racist or if he was just saying what popped into his head.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here's his quote:

The black is a better athlete to begin with, because he's been bred to be that way. Because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back. And they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs. And he's bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the Civil War, when, during the slave trading, the big, the owner, the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have uh big black kid, see. That's where it all started!

Racist. Definitely racist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, using "black" as a noun cleared that up pretty quickly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'm not trying to be pedantic, but I want to draw your attention to what you said about being unsure about the person's motives. If a person says something like "they (a group of people) are bred different" then that's racist. It doesn't matter if the person is a bigot or openly hates people for their skin color or not; that kind of belief is eugenics and is a racist belief.

Good people, well-intentioned people, can be and are racists, because they are raised with certain ideas and beliefs that are rooted in racism. The things that pop into heir head are racist because they haven't taken time to look into their own beliefs and understand where they come from, to de-racialize their thinking.

Or, you know, they're bigots and like having racist thoughts because it serves the bigotry, but that's a different problem.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"they (a group of people) are bred different" then that's racist

But American slavers quite literally bred black people. Yes, like animals. Hell, making it here on a slave ship could be called a form of breeding. Those ships were a perfect hell where only the strongest survived.

Jimmy was callous, out of place, racist, all that, but there was a solid grain of truth in there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What they don’t tell you: a lot of the “breeding” (rape) of enslaved people wasn’t based in modern understanding of genetics, and instead was based on insane shit like ‘everyone from this ethnic group must be better at growing rice.’

While undoubtedly horrible, I wouldn’t expect the Middle Passage to be more of a selective force for a population than any other disaster (war, famine, plague, etc) where healthy, strong people have the highest chance of survival. Especially when you consider that the majority of Black Americans have at least some white ancestry, which would contribute as well to their athletic ability along with their black ancestry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most Asians are lactose intolerant.

Oops, I did a racism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not the same thing though is it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not really.

Why are most Asians lactose intolerant? Why isn't their earwax the same as mine? Why are their teeth shaped differently? It's because they're bred different.

Acknowledging differences between various groups is not racist. Treating people differently based on the group they belong to is. Making assumptions about an individual based on the group you've assigned to them is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s a pretty big leap to go from “most Asians are lactose intolerant” to “they’re bred different”.

I get what you’re saying, and mostly agree. But “they’re bred different” implies some sort of sub-human deliberate motive beyond just a consequence of a population living in isolation for centuries.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why having a gentle hand in conversations about racism can really serve to change minds. The whole thing is such a sticky wicket anyway, it’s too easy to allow anger to control the course of discussion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Eugenics is not, by itself, racist. It is frequently used inappropriately by people with racist motives, but isn't necessarily so. For instance, the Ashkenazi Jews used a eugenics program to largely eliminate Tay-Sachs syndrome in their communities, by enforced genetic testing and forbidding marriage (or at least having children) for people that were both carriers of the genetic defect. There was also a strong tradition of arranged marriages, which made it much simpler.

The issue is that racists assume that a particular skin color (or ethnic group) is correlated with, for instance, being a "social parasite", or some such nonsense. The truth is that behavior is a very complex interplay between environment and genetics, and we simply can't make any reasonable conclusions about what specific genes will 100% definitely result in some kind of socially unacceptable behaviour, or even if that behaviour isn't positively adaptive in some other way. We can't even say which genes will probably result in traits that we currently consider to be negative, because genetics simply isn't destiny (outside of cases of genetic diseases).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't remember a specific example, but that does sound familiar. I remember someone claiming a possible reason for their strength was that slavers would breed slaves like animals for certain traits.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think someone who is forced to do hard labor since birth of course is gonna be stronger than a master who can't wipe his own ass without 15 servants helping him, so they gotta think blacks are naturally stronger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The famous example you're thinking of is Jimmy Snyder, aka Jimmy the Greek, a sports commentator and sports betting expert who used to work for CBS sports. He was interviewed as part of a series about civil rights in the US, and the interviewer was sort of expecting him to say something pleasant about black folks' success in athletics opening doors for education and leadership, etc.

Instead he made some pretty astonishing claims that were intensely racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was sort of the opposite at the very start of integrated sports. In the US and UK, at least, it was widely believed that Black men could not play sports simply because they did not, in fact, play (professional) sports. (And of course women were barely allowed to play sport at all in that era.)

Claims that Black people are naturally better at sports came later on, along with reasons why they couldn't swim, or play tennis or golf, or ride horses, or do any of those sports that coincidentally have more access for kids with wealthy and/or suburban parents.

System justification is an easy game to play. A story for every occasion.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Black people. White people.

I'm English, when you call people just a color it's degrading. So we add the 'people'.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

If you’re English, then you misspelt the word ‘colour’.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Same in the US now, but in our case it's because although 'people' is clearly self-evident if you're talking about a person/people, during the time of segregation those were the terms used - coloreds & whites. Whites Only Water Fountain. Whites Only Bathroom. Coloreds at the back of the bus, only Whites up front.

load more comments
view more: next ›