144
Aren't these the same investors that recently decided that that $56 billion package was reasonable? Do they even listen to themselves?
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)
News
23301 readers
3211 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
$56 billion to Elon is good because, based on his performance so far, he's the smartest man in the world who will make the best cars and make Tesla the most important corporation on the planet.
Have those lawyers ever come up with something genius like the Cybertruck? I rest my case.
If you don't pay the $7b then maybe next time Elon won't get his pay package...
And it's like one of the board members said, it's not about money. It's about making sure Elon is motivated and we do that....by giving him a bunch of money.
Their cognitive dissonance is strong.
I don't disagree, however I never found anyone breaking down the % of shares that Musk owns vs others. So I think it could be that Musk plus his buddies have enough shares to get the votes for the pay package, but only 51%, leaving 49% to be annoyed at the costs.
Not quite, the case was started by a small minority investor.
Small minority is even an understatement in how small the investor is. The suit was started by a metal head who owned less than 10 shares.
Tesla investors are insane. Imagine bootlicking this hard.
The fee is no more extraordinary than the pay Musk asked for. Considering stockholders have now confirmed the $56 billion payment to Musk, I suppose although involuntarily they simultaneously chose to acknowledge the high fee for the lawyers, as they used a completely normal percentage fee.
The only thing that made it exceptional, was the exceptional amount granted illegally to Musk. Which was made legal later by stockholders accepting it.
Had they done it correctly in the first place, there wouldn't have been a lawsuit against them, costing that percentage fee.
Confirmed, money is just made up and the numbers are meaningless
Btw OP, it's gonna cost you $1 billion for me writing this comment on your post, I take card and bank transfer (no checks).
So how much are they paying the lawyers to dispute these fees?
Probably 20 billion.
The fee equals around $7.2 billion at Tesla's Friday's stock price and amounts to a rate of roughly $370,000 for every hour worked by the 37 lawyers, associates and paralegals, some of whom normally bill as little as $275 an hour, according to court documents submitted Tornetta's lawyers.
I’m gonna send my boss a bill for over 1000 x my usual pay and just retire. I’m sure that’ll work with no objections. Wtf
He got $56 billion. Pretty sure he can afford the $7 billion. Is it a requirement to have your nose directly in Elon's ass before you invest in Tesla? I don't recall that being a thing when I had my shares.
I'm willing to bet that Elmo signed off on it during a ketamine binge, and they have the receipts.