This is wild. Not only mandatory validation, but some sort of credit system to monitor how much porn a person is watching?
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
59 points (92.8% liked)
News
23259 readers
3270 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I guess they're gonna provide a government service that recommends porn based on your watching habits. There's no other sane reason.
I like how when it comes to stupid shit, never fear, government is on the case. When it comes to anything that would actually improve folks' quality of life, though, they're helpless babies.
I know not all governments, but the American govt is most of what I have to go off of.
The spanish government said last year that they were gonna decrease the weekly work hours from 40 to 38.5 in 2024, 37.5 in 2025.
It's July and I'm still working 40 hours.
But they can establish a porn surveillance system in a few months.
What the fuck are these priorities.
And this is where a generation of future Spanish hackers will first cut their teeth as digital outlaws. Never underestimate the lengths a pubescent boy will go through to see sum tiddy.
The fuck is wrong with people? Who votes for something like this?
Jesus freaks.
What the fuck
I wonder if they realize that kids know how to use VPNs,
This post was brought to you by NordVPN
PornVPN
Vpn
Sounds like something the far right would encourage. If it is only in Madrid, well, you should know about Isabel Diaz Ayuso.
Couldn't be more wrong.
It is not only in Madrid. When they say "Madrid unveils" it's because Madrid is Spain's capital so the government is there, it's the same as "Spain's government unveils".
It also isn't a far right thing, but a push by the left (the current government of Spain is lead by PSOE, Spain's socialist party). Their reasoning is that porn is unhealthy for the kids and it teaches them that women are submissive or whatever.
I guess that gay porn won't consume credits then because there is no women involved.
It's just straight up bullshit.
I agree that porn is not good for the brain. And i tends to portray women as submissive. Still, i do not believe it is necesary to ban it outright in this way. What a weird legislation.