this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
665 points (69.6% liked)

Memes

45728 readers
895 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 12) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (18 children)

clean... so many storage pools full of spent fuel, no home for them in sight... hundreds of pools, spread all over the US....

clean?

I mean cleaner than coal, sure. but it's enormous infrastructure and regulatory hurdles aren't worth it.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No it is not. If you calculate in the future money tax payers have to pay to keep the nuclear waste safe (for thousands of years) or the cost of a larger incident like Chernobyl or Fukushima which also has to be paid by the tax payers then the 'cheap nuklear power' is not so cheap as it looks like...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Renewables fed into a fusion reactor is the best currently

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›