this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
87 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

37685 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla, the maker of the popular web browser Firefox, said it received government demands to block add-ons that circumvent censorship.

The Mozilla Foundation, the entity behind the web browser Firefox, is blocking various censorship circumvention add-ons for its browser, including ones specifically to help those in Russia bypass state censorship. The add-ons were blocked at the request of Russia’s federal censorship agency, Roskomnadzor — the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media — according to a statement by Mozilla to The Intercept.

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information.”

Stanislav Shakirov, the chief technical officer of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian open internet group, said he hoped it was a rash decision by Mozilla that will be more carefully examined.

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information, and its policy was somewhat different,” Shakirov said. “And due to these values, it should not be so simple to comply with state censors and fulfill the requirements of laws that have little to do with common sense.”

Developers of digital tools designed to get around censorship began noticing recently that their Firefox add-ons were no longer available in Russia.

On June 8, the developer of Censor Tracker, an add-on for bypassing internet censorship restrictions in Russia and other former Soviet countries, made a post on the Mozilla Foundation’s discussion forums saying that their extension was unavailable to users in Russia.

The developer of another add-on, Runet Censorship Bypass, which is specifically designed to bypass Roskomnadzor censorship, posted in the thread that their extension was also blocked. The developer said they did not receive any notification from Mozilla regarding the block.

Two VPN add-ons, Planet VPN and FastProxy — the latter explicitly designed for Russian users to bypass Russian censorship — are also blocked. VPNs, or virtual private networks, are designed to obscure internet users’ locations by routing users’ traffic through servers in other countries.

The Intercept verified that all four add-ons are blocked in Russia. If the webpage for the add-on is accessed from a Russian IP address, the Mozilla add-on page displays a message: “The page you tried to access is not available in your region.” If the add-on is accessed with an IP address outside of Russia, the add-on page loads successfully.

Supervision of Communications

Roskomnadzor is responsible for “control and supervision in telecommunications, information technology, and mass communications,” according to the Russia’s federal censorship agency’s English-language page.

In March, the New York Times reported that Roskomnadzor was increasing its operations to restrict access to censorship circumvention technologies such as VPNs. In 2018, there were multiple user reports that Roskomnadzor had blocked access to the entire Firefox Add-on Store.

According to Mozilla’s Pledge for a Healthy Internet, the Mozilla Foundation is “committed to an internet that includes all the peoples of the earth — where a person’s demographic characteristics do not determine their online access, opportunities, or quality of experience.” Mozilla’s second principle in their manifesto says, “The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.”

The Mozilla Foundation, which in tandem with its for-profit arm Mozilla Corporation releases Firefox, also operates its own VPN service, Mozilla VPN. However, it is only available in 33 countries, a list that doesn’t include Russia.

The same four censorship circumvention add-ons also appear to be available for other web browsers without being blocked by the browsers’ web stores. Censor Tracker, for instance, remains available for the Google Chrome web browser, and the Chrome Web Store page for the add-on works from Russian IP addresses. The same holds for Runet Censorship Bypass, VPN Planet, and FastProxy.

“In general, it’s hard to recall anyone else who has done something similar lately,” said Shakirov, the Russian open internet advocate. “For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If something is illegal in a country, then it should be blocked for that country. It's not Mozillas decision what a government allows and not. It would be different problem if the extensions were blocked worldwide, but its not. It's only blocked where its illegal.

But, that above statement by me is about laws. I'm not so sure how to feel about government requests, if its not even against the law. Is there any law in Russia that forbids those extensions? If not, then I'm with you and this is bad. But if there are laws in place and the government asks to block them because of the law, then it's totally fine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

That's how it would work for a country where the laws actually mean something. In this case, the law is just whatever the Kremlin says.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is why sideloading addons is so important. They've recently removed the bypass-paywalls-clean addon too.

On the desktop version you can easily sideload addons but on the mobile version they forbid this :(

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

on the mobile version they forbid this :(

at least they allow addons on mobile. i think mobile Chrome STILL doesn't bee upside down emoji

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A title, a teaser text, two paragraphs, and only in the one after inside a quote can I read that it's limited blocking within Russia, not a general removal or blockage.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information.

Well there's your problem.

The values of any corporation are "make the stockholders and executives richer". Whatever utter horseshit they spew in their "mission statements" and "values" documents are just that, utter horseshit.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit. Mozilla Corporation is a subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation.

You're claiming those forms are the same as any stock market company?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

"Non-profit" doesn't mean nobody gets paid

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Just like a corporate entity. Good job Mozilla, for standing strong on the freedom and privacy front of the internet.

But fuck Russian dissenters, right? They don't need that shit.

/s Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Mozilla is notoriously pro censorship, they blocked dissenter a while ago.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The censorship is not a decision by Mozilla, its a government decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

What is dissenter

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Mozilla, I'm so disappointed but I shouldn't be surprised. I guess I'll be looking for a fork.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't think forking Firefox is going to change what you see in the add-on store. You would need someone to run their own store. Or just install the plugin manually.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There are already a bunch of Firefox forks so I'm not sure what you mean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is a problem with the add-on store, not the browser. Do the forks have their own add-on stores? Or do they just use the same one that Mozilla provides? To the best of my knowledge, the only forks that have their own stores are the ones that wouldn't be able to use Firefox plugins anyway (e.g. Palemoon).