this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37756 readers
560 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Targeting an open source project. So brave, what a statement. /s

This has 0 effect on all the big AI companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, etc. All this does is make it harder for FOSS projects and leaves the corporations to dominate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Its low hanging fruit for script kiddies

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Art theft

I mean, they're not wrong but ... since they're also hacking people their motives seem kind of mixed.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They are wrong. Theft means depriving someone of having something, and that’s not the case here. It’s more a “they’re taking our jobs” kind of situation.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You forget all the images that "AI" models are trained on without consent or payment. Plus as you say, that training could result in the same artists losing work. Double theft, of IP and future income.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I look at art without paying anyone, I guess I'm stealing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Important difference between you and an ML model: you can enjoy that art (YMMV), the ML never will.

There is a similar distinction between artists and galleries putting artwork to the public, and corporations auto-scraping billions of artwork for a statistical engine to mass produce qualitatively lesser versions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

You should read this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF, and this one by Cory Doctorow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All artists train themselves on others artwork, most probably unpaid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Wow. All artists throughout history just facedesked at that comment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

That’s what I’ve been saying! At most it’s piracy

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

It does kind of drive home an argument that it'd be nice to have Stable Diffusion extensions, if not the whole program, run in isolation. I don't know how hardened the GPU drivers are, and those have to be exposed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Good artists copy. Great artists sabotage free software in order to steal crypto wallets and credit card numbers.