this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024

68 points (97.2% liked)

News

23287 readers

3690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A shady financial tool from the housing-bubble era is making a comeback | CNN Business (www.cnn.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Zero down mortgages don't seem like a bad thing as long as the asessments of the borrowers and their mortgages are genuine.

This article keeps equivocating the subprime mortgage crisis with this zero down mortgage tool, but the subprime mortgage crisis was caused by literal fraud, not the existence of a particular mortgage process.

Zero down mortgages can be structured as schemes to fool people, but that's not what caused the mortgage crisis, the mortgage crisis was caused by creditors falsely assessing variable mortgage values and knowingly selling them to people who couldn't afford them for a short-term profit.

Zero down no interest mortgages on the other hand, can be a great tool for people looking for a home.

Read what the contract says, do your due diligence before you buy and make sure you have enough to keep up with your mortgage, like with any mortgage.

The risks the article talks about are the same risks you're going to get with any type of mortgage, not just zero down mortgages.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The subprime crisis was way more than just fraud. It was many compounding levels of fraud. Assessors would essentially be bribed into justifying whatever value the agent wanted, now they don't have direct contact and can't just pick a number around the offer number. Brokers could get approval for someone either no verified income, assets, or even a job in some cases, this again is no longer actually possible for conventional mortgages. Insurance companies gave safety ratings on mortgage securities that were entirely made up, again this isn't happening anymore. Mortgages were bought and sold so many times there wasn't really a record of who actually owns many of them, again no longer possible and managing ownership with physical paper is required. Mortgage securities were also leveraged as safe assets to guarantee further loans, which once again isn't actually allowed anymore.

Edit: I forga big one. Adjustable rate mortgages had no total cap on rate growth, so rate could increase each adjustment period indefinitely, now they are limited to a maximum increase usually 5%. So now if you get about ARM at 5%, it will never go above 10% for the interest rate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Yup, it was fraud.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I disagree. If borrowers are unable to afford a down payment, that almost certainly means they have very little financial flexibility, which is necessary when owning a home. Now, I'm not trying to blame borrowers for this scenario. They are living through an affordability crisis and are almost certainly affected by the housing crisis if they are renting (as opposed to living rent-free/light with family). By allowing zero down mortgages, it's treating a symptom, but letting the underlying causes fester.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure but if people have been able to consistently pay rent higher than their mortgage I think they'll be fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I know that's the case in some markets, but I think it's pretty close in most places. Especially when you consider the other expenses of ownership like maintenance, property tax, insurance, etc. I know in my situation, we have a few hundred dollars a month more flexibility by owning instead of renting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Zero down may be the only way a family can afford to buy a home. In a time where older starter homes are north of 300k, we’re asking families to save 60k cash to get to 20% down. That’s about the median household income.

If you’re able to save 10% of your paycheck (after taxes), you’re going to spend about 10 years saving for today’s price. Which will likely be much lower than next years price.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Is 20% the rule where you live? The article says the down payment is 3%.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Family making 60k, has no business buying 300k house esp with zero down.... How do you even budget these numbers lol

Get real

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

If borrowers are unable to afford a down payment, that almost certainly means they have very little financial flexibility.

Possibly. It might also deplete their only source of financial flexibility, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I understand your concern, but that's throwing the baby out with the bath water. And then throwing out a baby next door from a crib who wasn't even taking a bath.

Treating a symptom does not mean you aren't working on a cure.

In this example, specifically, working with zero down mortgages affords borrowers the ability to make their own choices without stopping me you or anyone else from trying to change the underlying mortgage system.

It's one more tool

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I disagree. If borrowers are unable to afford a down payment, that almost certainly means they have very little financial flexibility, which is necessary when owning a home.

I think you're looking at this one particular point in a vacuum. On the surface it would appear that someone that can't produce $20k-$40k cash to put down on a house doesn't have the financial wherewithal to produce $20k in cash that may be needed to replace a roof or HVAC system on a house.

However, zoom out a bit and you'll see these non-homeowners have been financially savvy to successfully navigating rental rates outpacing inflation by 40%! source. Once they have a fixed rate mortgage, their ability to plan an save for home repairs becomes much more attainable.

Ask yourself this: How would your personal finances look right now if your house payment had been rising every year for the last decade and is now 40% higher that when you signed your mortgage paperwork?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Subprime 2: Electric Boogaloo

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

The market is back - can our hero kill it dead this time?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We’ve tried everything and we’re all out of ideas.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

The shady financial tool was NINA loans. Banks were giving out money to people with zero evidence that they could pay it back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Solution is more housing and lower prices... Not paper voodoo