this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
862 points (98.4% liked)

News

23259 readers
2756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We need to identify each juror. Then make them miserable. Maybe even suicidal,” wrote another user on the same forum. “1,000,000 men (armed) need to go to washington and hang everyone. That’s the only solution,” wrote another user. “This s--- is out of control.”

“I hope every juror is doxxed and they pay for what they have done,” another user wrote on Trump’s Truth Social platform Thursday. “May God strike them dead. We will on November 5th and they will pay!”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 253 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Get their IP addresses. Jail them. Easy. You prevent terrorist attacks. But I guess that's too much to ask from police.

[–] [email protected] 227 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Some of those those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

I'm so fucking tired of seeing this quote constantly... but it's inarguably a pervasive problem. I need this to stop being true so I don't have to see it all the time.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago

I'm tired of this quote being forever relevant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

Grizzled police-chief: get me those IP addresses

Nerd: setting up the back-trace now, wait, the ip is 127.0.0.1

Grizzled police-chief: don't give me that geek-talk poindexter, speak english

[Zoom in]

Nerd: the post was coming from inside the station.

[No one is shocked]

fin.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Here is the problem: These people very carefully choose their words. It’s not illegal to “wish” all the jurors are outed, tortured, maimed, and drawn and quartered over a bed of coals- along with their families, neighbors and first grade teachers.

See that’s all okay to say apparently. This is our legal system. It’s not until they actually say, “I’m going to […],” that LE gets involved. Because none of that other stuff was a direct threat, or intended to incite violence, or intended to instill fear. They were just harmless wishes. Super okay, and nothing to worry about, you see?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Here is the problem: These people very carefully choose their words.

This has not been my experience with Trump supporters on the internet. Ever.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This is exactly what they’ve done. Notice everything (except for “make them miserable”, which isn’t inherently illegal..) is placed on “someone else should…”:

1,000,000 men (armed) need to […]

I hope every juror is doxxed and they pay […]

May God strike them dead.

They know exactly what they are doing. Doing it mafia style, just like dear leader.

Edit: Idiots downvoting what’s right in their face. Can’t believe facts, only emotions. Just like the idiots following Trump. Idiots are idiots. Here is more evidence for you, on this exact topic from reuters:

While the posts identified by Reuters all called for violence or insurrection, most fell short of the legal standard for a prosecutable threat, which typically requires evidence that the comment reflects a clear intent to act or instill fear, rather than simply suggesting a frightening outcome.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-supporters-call-riots-violent-retribution-after-verdict-2024-05-31/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yes and no.

There are no "magic words" that make a threat legal. It's always a question of context.

For example if Don Corleone came to your business and said "Nice place you got here, would be a shame if it burned down. By the way I happen to sell fire protection", that would absolutely be illegal even though he never said he would do anything wrong. The intent is clear to all.

So it doesn't really matter if someone says "I wish that guy was dead!" vs "I'm going to kill that guy!" Either one can be an illegal true threat, or not, depending on the context.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

We really need better enforcement of laws on threatening civil servants.

These jurors did a job that I might even struggle to take due to the likelihood of these assholes might fuck my life up. Imo, they should be given at least a year of Secret Service or US Marshall protection.

I personally don't trust the local PD to protect them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

Conservatives make up over 90% of police in the U.S. Conservatism should be a diaqualifier for positions of authority. It is unsafe to give such dangerous people power over others.

[–] [email protected] 197 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a terrorist group. Label them as such

[–] [email protected] 120 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"we are all domestic terrorists"

- GOP

[–] [email protected] 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And that's not being snide - they actually had that on the giant scroller at the rnc convention!

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

When someone tells you what they are, believe them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 173 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Gee, I wonder why people think Trump supporters are fascists.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 5 months ago (5 children)

It's astonishing how quickly republicans have aligned to the behaviours of the Nazi party of the 1930s. They're leveraging trump's conviction exactly the same as the Nazis used the Reichstag fire to turn the power of the government against anyone opposed to them.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Conservatives are a threat to stable and peaceful societies, and an existential threat to the whole human race due to their climate change denialism. As long as we continue to pretend that conservatism is a valid political ideology and not psychopathy and sadism packaged up to look like politics, they'll continue to undermine democracy and peace until they get the genocide(s) they keep clamoring for

In the present research (N = 675), we focus on the relationship between the dark side of human personality and political orientation and extremism, respectively, in the course of a presidential election where the two candidates represent either left-wing or right-wing political policies. Narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and everyday sadism were associated with right-wing political orientation, whereas narcissism and psychopathy were associated with political extremism. Moreover, the relationships between personality and right-wing political orientation and extremism, respectively, were relatively independent from each other.

We found eleven significant correlations between conservative [Moral Intuition Survey] judgments and the Dark Triad – [narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy,] all at significance level of p<.00001 – and no significant correlations between liberal [Moral Intuition Survey] judgments and the Dark Triad. We believe that these results raise provocative moral questions about the personality bases of moral judgments. In particular, we propose that because the Short-D3 measures three “dark and antisocial” personality traits, our results raise some prima facie worries about the moral justification of some conservative moral judgments

[–] [email protected] 135 points 5 months ago (26 children)

Conservatism should be openly treated as the deadly, dangerous ideology that it is. It produces only bigotry, oppression and death.

In all of human history, nothing good has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They're a little late, the conviction has happened. If they wanted to interfere with the outcome of the trial they should have done that before the verdict. Silly treasonous fascists.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're not silly at all, they're thugs. They want to influence the next one by showing the cost of going against them.

Now, we're lucky that they're mostly grifting, incompetent, blustery cowards, so the risk isn't what it could be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They don't care about cause and effect, they are just angry and dumb.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean yeah but in their defense ....oh who am I kidding. If you're still defending trump you're a trash person...there is no defense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'm glad the jurors have been smart enough to stay quiet. Now that the verdict is in, there is nothing keeping them from going public with details about their deliberations, but they seem to have all agreed it is best to keep out of the public eye. I wonder if the two lawyers purported to be on the jury advised them of that.

Still, I wouldn't be surprised if at least one of them already has an advance to write a book about it, which we will see eventuallty. I wonder if they get to keep their notes.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They absolutely should remain publicly silent until sentencing, personal safety aside. Publicly expressing opinions could be used in an appeal as argument for influencing the judge prior to sentencing.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

On the flip side, the judge should absolutely use Trump violating his gag order to express his opinions about the case and those involved to impose prison time as part of his sentence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gosh! It’s lovely to see that they are such calm, reasonable and intelligent people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine simping for this ugly, rich loser. I’d kind of get it if he was at least hot. Part of me thinks these simps are fake people that Trump and team created.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Mostly fake, foundationally created by pootin to get his favorite puppet elected, and to foment civil war.

And the uber-loser maga simps bought and jumped all in to racist christofascistlandia.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

These people are nothing, but a bunch of unhinged cowards. Fuck'em.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

No, some of them are also insurrectionists who've already tried to overthrow their government once.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago

Can someone please create an organization called "Pride Boys" and make them so popular that searching for "proud boys" on google will turn up images of rainbow flags and gay men?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Disgusting but not too shocking knowing his supporters nowadays.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What if we gave them the address to Sam Alito's house?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“May God strike them dead. We will on November 5th”

…is a “win” missing or are they openly saying they’ll kill them on election day?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

It's only fitting for the man with the best words to finally get a sentence

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

I counter attack with, using their names to create an online fund raiser to make these reasonable people rich.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

Notice how there were never any big protests or demonstrations at the actual courthouse.

load more comments
view more: next ›