Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar who could think you under the table.
David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel
What an incredibly weak article with the metaphor of Descartes cogito redneckishly bolted on to make it seem like there's a deeper point...
Just as Descartes seeks certainty about the world, so supporters of QAnon (known as QAnons) seek a day of reckoning
So the unifying thing is they both seek something. Those things are a critical understanding of the world in one hand and... Well blind cultism on the other.
Descartes famously found certainty in his capacity to think: “I think, therefore I am.
...
There seems to be a different kind of Cogito at play in QAnon’s overarching mantra, “Where we go one, we go all”.
That's no 'cogito' that's the complete opposite, rather a 'non cogito'.
The person who wrote this is an idiot and should be banned anything philosophy related.
René Descartes was a drunken fart
I drink, therefore I am
That's some grade-A, freshman-composition-class-final bullshit right there. Congrats on getting it published, I guess.