this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
11 points (92.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
459 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe it is out there, but the Internet Archive should be wildly redundant on the internet, it's just too valuable to lose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I controlled a paper, I’d force a git control system with publicly viewable edits made after publication.

Imagine the goodwill and trust that would instill in the public toward your paper.

Edit: I’ve thought the same thing about proposed legislation for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think many have also been wondering about version control of legislation/law documents for some time as well. But I never understand why it’s not realized yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because the people who would implement that system would be the same people it would hold to account.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is useful for pointing out if a news site is manipulating a narrative, but for other things, I think news site should get the privacy they need to make stealth edits.

Like:

More recently, the Times stealth-edited an article that originally listed “death” as one of six ways “you can still cancel your federal student loan debt.” Following the edit, the “death” section title was changed to a more opaque heading of “debt won’t carry on.”

This was just poor wording. No reason sites shouldn't have the peace of mind to change poor wording without being called out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...... What? No, if you need to edit poor wording you add a note establishing that the editor missed a section of poor wording, and that section has been revised.

You want to do stealth edits? We call those first drafts, and they arent published. Want to hide your edit history? Edit before you post.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People can make mistakes and miss things you know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And there is nothing wrong with that, nor is there anything wrong in admitting your mistakes

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

This is actually a perfect example of why we need to archive these things. Don't let corporations try to rewrite history wtf