this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23301 readers
3191 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For the second time this month the Biden administration is bypassing Congress to approve an emergency weapons sale to Israel as Israel continues to prosecute its war against Hamas in Gaza under increasing international criticism.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Bro, it's like they wanna lose so badly next year election. Listen to the people voting for you, for fuck sake.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've decided I'm just not voting next election. I'm sick of all the drama and lies, The US is fucked anyway, might as well not leave it on life support. Between constant wars, inability to handle the most basic of citizens needs and each party being a pissing contest I just decided there's no point in doing so. Not like either candidate follows their user bases values anyway and it's super unlikely anyone else will win. I'll change my mind when I see evidence that says otherwise. I've given it 8 years and seen no real big change.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How many civilian deaths is Biden responsible for and how many was trump responsible for? trump is probably the lesser of 2 evils in that respect at this point

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Trump ramped up killing civilians with drone strikes under his administration.

"Airwars, estimates the number to be as great as 7,500."

https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2019/5/8/18619206/under-donald-trump-drone-strikes-far-exceed-obama-s-numbers

That's direct deaths ordered by Trump which is completely different Biden allowing an arm sale planned months/years ago to go through.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/the-biden-administration-once-again-bypasses-congress-on-an-emergency-weapons-sale-to-israel

Biden gave Natenyahu carte blanche after oct 7th and told him the US would have his back no matter what. Biden is in the position to put pressure on the Israeli gov but refuses to do so. The blood is on his hands

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Hundreds of thousands of people that died from covid likely would have lived had anyone else been in office, even other Republicans. If I was a law and order type I'd say Trump should be hanged for mass murder. But you could say the same of Biden when looking at his political history really.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

After seeing the way Biden has handled covid you really think he would've done anything better than trump in 2020? I really really doubt it.

Biden has always pushed for more bombing in the middle east his record speaks for itself he's a bloodthirsty imperialist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idiotic, totally clueless take.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Brilliant response I'm totally owned. Have fun voting for genocide

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Listen to the people voting for you, for fuck sake.

Are you new here, or did you miss when the Democratic party shut down Bernie Sanders twice in a row because he was gaining momentum and they were like "fuck, we can't have a person who actually cares as President, we might not have as much money!!!"

Because this is par for the course.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not the best comparative argument, since the voting public was quite clear in that regard and the conspiracies claimed were debunked pretty easily.

I, for example, was someone who voted against him because of his long-standing anti-science stances and his promotion of pseudoscience (such as him personally using his Senate position to host an "alternative medicine" conference).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You mean when they destroyed the Iowa caucus and handed the victory to a nobody loser candidate who never won another state?

Not like it fucking matters. He showed his true colors when the Party gave him his marching orders. Bend the knee to the nominee, support the President no matter what, and for what? Clout? Social Democrats are the moderate wing of fascism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What even is the conspiracy there? Buttigieg won. Narrowly, but he won. And both he and Sanders demanded recounts for several of the counties, which was done. Incompetent county level people, often because they have no experience and are even volunteers for much of the vote counting, is fairly common. The complicatedness of Iowa's procedure, where non-viable candidate voters get to re-vote for the viable ones makes errors even more likely.

And errors were made in favor of both Buttigieg and Sanders, which were later corrected.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The AP itself doesn't trust the results enough to declare a winner.

Shadow Inc., which both Buttigieg and Biden payed for services in 2019, shat the bed and ruined the caucus. Those results and the recanvass were riddled with errors and inconsistencies, ranging from bad math to bad handwriting to bad head counting. It's not trustworthy.

Now, for my speculation: the Party sabotaged the Iowa caucus to stop an outsider from getting momentum in Iowa. Maybe the plan was always to just crash the caucus so it didn't matter, maybe Iowa was always supposed to be sacrificed, but if Bernie had won Iowa and then proceeded to win all the states leading up to South Carolina I don't think Biden would have won. There's a clear motive.

And what we do know is Obama played kingmaker by getting almost the entire field of candidates to drop out, including the supposed Iowa winner Buttigieg, to endorse Biden and keep the outsider from recovering after South Carolina.

Part ordinary party-politics, part suspicious dealing with Shadow Inc., and the outsider was kept from winning. I know is there's no hope for me in that party, because if another outsider comes they will be stopped because the party will circle the wagons.

Especially now Iowa has been discarded. No more first in the nation, no more caucus, we're just another trash redstate to be ignored.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now, for my speculation: the Party sabotaged the Iowa caucus to stop an outsider from getting momentum in Iowa.

That is, at least, a conspiracy. Not one that stands up to scrutiny though. Shadow Inc did screw up. Unfortunately, if you look at state level things in many, many prior elections, that's not uncommon. State level voting systems are tacked together, poorly funded crapshoots.

And your claims about Obama doesn't have anything to do with the voters. If the people who supported those candidates supported Bernie as a replacement, then that's how they would have voted. But they didn't. He in fact lost worse than in the previous election.

The fact that the earliest states in the primary have long been those that don't represent the general Democrat voting public has been a complaint for years, if not decades. So changing what states are at the beginning has been something pushed for for years as well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

That is, at least, a conspiracy. Not one that stands up to scrutiny though. Shadow Inc did screw up. Unfortunately, if you look at state level things in many, many prior elections, that’s not uncommon. State level voting systems are tacked together, poorly funded crapshoots.

And your claims about Obama doesn’t have anything to do with the voters. If the people who supported those candidates supported Bernie as a replacement, then that’s how they would have voted. But they didn’t. He in fact lost worse than in the previous election.

So your argument is "all state level elections are fucked and Iowa isn't special". That's actually a reasonable counter argument! Maybe all states look shady and corrupt and broken whenever anyone looks at them as closely as people looked at Iowa after the caucus imploded. If that's the case, though, then that's just a further argument for not trusting the elections!

And to clarify, I wasn't claiming Obama playing kingmaker was a conspiracy (although it was in the literal sense of the word i.e. multiple politicians conspiring together to make Biden the nominee by endorsing him). That's actually just normal party politics. It just shows that there's actually no hope for an outsider to win a party nomination, which is to be expected.