This is the case that is most relevant to his candidacy in my opinion. There is testimony to be heard that Trump provided classified information to Russian intelligence and sold classified submarine specifications to foreign investors. These are very serious allegations, and the public should know if they’re valid prior to charging him with the responsibility of confidentiality a second time.
this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
386 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4437 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I honestly don't think it would change anyone's mind at this point.
What important is that the reality of his crimes be made public and on record. That one still supporting him afterwards is complicit in those crimes.
Anyone who still supports him after all of the shit he's said and done is complicit. It was clear from the beginning he was an asshole.
They were complicit in 2016. They’re indirectly responsible for millions of unnecessary covid deaths thanks to Trump’s delayed and botched response, lives lost during and after January 6th, and many other nasty events caused by orange hitler.
Maybe, maybe not. I still believe we’re entitled to the result of the hearing prior to election.
Most of trumps legal issues have been like this. He's gotten special treatment every step of the way. If we ever needed a reminder that we have a two tier legal system, this is it.
The saddest part is that it will probably take a conviction in this trial for many US citizens to realize that Trump is not a viable presidential candidate. The state of American society is frightening.
Bold of you to think a conviction will convince them. More likely is them deciding it’s an attack of the Deep State on their God-Emperor, and they’ll vote even harder for him, or any Republican who promises to free him.
Tbh I don't even think that Trump will get convicted. The fact that he's still somehow at large makes me think that he and his henchmen built their own "Deep State" by now.
Every accusation is a confession.
The confession for this accusation is that the Court system is stacked with Conservative judges to push a Conservative agenda.
This guy was put in power by strong Russian influence. It worked. Shame on the idiots who voted, and/or vote for him. It's so fucking obvious.
The word they're looking for is 'corruption'.
Yea it’d be nice if that mattered…
The insanity is the entire judicial branch showing how completely corrupted it’s become and what little interest it has in policing itself.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Aileen Cannon, the Florida judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's classified documents case, "represents a special kind of governmental insanity," attorney and legal analyst Glenn Kirschner said on Saturday.
Trump is facing dozens of felony counts accusing him of illegally keeping classified documents that he took with him after he left the White House in 2021 at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and then obstructing the government's efforts to get them back.
The move has also drawn blowback from Democrats, like Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who, according to The Hill on Thursday, said it appears that Cannon is "deliberately slow-walking the case."
In his YouTube video, Kirschner said that Cannon "failed to timely litigate and resolve some of the pre-trial motions that have been sitting there for months, and now due to her own sloth, at best, her inexcusable neglect, she needs to cancel the May 20th trial date."
Sharing a similar view, Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama under the Barack Obama administration, wrote in her newsletter, Civil Discourse, on Sunday, "This case could and should have been ready for trial in December or January if she had been working on the motions and realistic deadlines all along."
In the classified documents case, it has been clear that the trial would not start in May as Cannon "let critical motions stack up and refused to rule," Vance wrote Sunday.
The original article contains 517 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Troof