this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3616 readers
122 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
92
Yes, Australia’s big supermarkets have been price gouging. But fixing the problem won’t be easy (theconversation.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A much-awaited report into Coles and Woolworths has found what many customers have long believed – Australia’s big supermarkets engage in price gouging.

What started as a simple Senate inquiry into grocery prices and supermarket power has delivered a lengthy 195-page-long report spanning supermarket pricing’s impact on customers, food waste, relationships with suppliers, employee wages and conditions, excessive profitability, company mergers and land banking.

The report makes some major recommendations, including giving courts the power to break up anti-competitive businesses, and strengthening the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

It also recommends making the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct mandatory for supermarket chains. This code governs how they should deal with suppliers. The government’s recent Independent Review of the Food and Grocery Code also recommended making it mandatory for the supermarket giants.

But at this point it’s hard to say what, if anything, the recommendations will mean for everyday Australians and the prices they actually pay.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I've just spent a month in Taiwan. There are no supermarkets there basically.

There are markets. With everyday people trading.

The money moves amongst the people. Not amongst the two big supermarkets like in Australia.

Due to this, the people get the money. Not the mega corps.

The competition is balanced and strong, and prices are low.

I saw just how screwed we are in Australia when visiting Taiwan.

Their culture won't allow a duopoly like we have.

I can only hope that we can break free from it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Canada has the same problem, but our monopoly now is an everything company. Loblaws owns pharmacies, financial institutions, telcom infrastructure, and are vertically integrated throughout the logistics and production side of the grocery chain, while also operating the most stores. They got caught price fixing bread for almost 20 years, and they posted the highest quarterly revenue in decades after "adjusting for inflation". The government is talking about trying to more heavily regulate the industry but when there's only basically one guy doing it, he effectively tells you to go fuck yourself because you can't turn to anyone else.

Right now, for the month of May at least, we're actively boycotting their stores, which is quite difficult in a lot of remote regions. It's a good thing that it's springtime though, because farmers markets are opening up more frequently around town where I can get actual quality produce and goods from real people who produced it all themselves. I am with you 100% on wishing we were all market-based and not supermarket-based.

At the very least, we're trying to hit the corps in the wallet and see what happens. The CEO has actually been on record calling the boycott "misguided".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Even if boycotting supermarkets doesn't force them to change, you are at least helping local markets to survive and improve as an alternative. The only reason those markets still existed for you to turn to is because of the work and patronage of people who were there before you, and now you are also playing your part in keeping them alive for future consumers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I saw the thoughtslime video on loblaws and they did one earlier on the telecom situation in Canada. It should be a warning on how bad things can get herr

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is one of the core purposes of a governments existence — to protect citizens from the unethical/immoral sociopaths that capitalism's for-profit nature encourages and rewards.

If they're too corrupt or inept to perform that function then they don't deserve to govern.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

The code of conduct only covers dealing with suppliers. With no breakup of the duopoly and no regulations in place regarding price at point of sale, making it mandatory is only going to force prices higher to maintain the margin. I do believe suppliers should get paid fairly, but the average person is going to get fucked here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Stop fucking around and start getting serious.

  • ban phantom branding
  • band landbanking (if you don't develop a commercial site within x years you must sell)
  • give the anticompetitive oversight some fucking teeth including the power to allow market share caps and divesture
  • get some goddamn policy in place to protect the growers
  • audit the cunts constantly and consistently until they stop acting like greedy pigboys
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

landbanking

Major conflict of interest for a big retailer to hold property beyond what they occupy themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's a common tactic - buy land in an area being developed to lock out the competition.

Or in developed areas (hands up who remembers what happened to bi-lo at chaddy....)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Double coles at northcote plaza for example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Double woolies in Mount waverley as well. (Last i saw it became a dan murphys)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Fixing the problem isn't necessarily easy, but the solution is simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Have they tried taking the board and all the c-suite level Executives out back and and shooting them? Cuz I bet that's a good start.