this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
353 points (96.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
388 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not a cost overrun, the scope of the project got expanded to include carrier operations.

Look up FUTA docking to see the cost breakdown

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The carrier operations are shared jointly between several NATO countries, and would mostly be covered under the Yearly International Freedom Fund (YIFF).

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense, but will that also cover the Vertically Oriented Reconnaissance Equipment (VORE) package as well?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Indeed, it's necessary in order to sync its Direct Intervention Combustible Kinetics via the Tactical Information Transmission System.

If you ask me, it's this combo of DICK and TITS that really makes FUTA special.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

Im gonna post this on Nextdoor rq lmfao

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad they were on budged for project BLUEWAFFLE.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

GOATSE had such cost overruns

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Blew the budget wide open.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Print these out and post them all over the DC metro

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Really? I was gonna look that up anyways, guess I can make time for some UAV research

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Look at that thing. It has so much stuff on it. VTOL, normal flight, antennas, and who knows what else to be strapped on it. Does everything, but none of it well. Well, except make some defense contractor a shitton of money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

That's the aerosonde and it's actually a sick piece of tech. They're competing for the tactical UAS contract right now, and VTOL is a requirement, so bolt-on packages for existing platforms are kind of an easy out. Also it's a recon platform so fly and do camera are really the only things it has to do well.