this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
2008 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1680 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So why does Apple use USB-C on iPad Pro and MacBooks?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Phones go in pockets. Pockets have lint. Lightning ports are way easier to clean than USB-C.

iPads and Macbooks mostly stay in the house or get carried in a bag rather than a pocket. Way less lint, so the benefits of USB-C far outweigh the benefits of Lightning here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How much more lint do you think will an USB-C port catch than a lightning port? Answer: Insignificantly little. You'r reaching for arguments here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I said easier to clean not that it catches less lint. I could even use a toothpick for my iPhone. Nothing thicker than a sim tool worked for my Oneplus and that had trouble getting it all out. Even most NEEDLES I had were too thick.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they co-developed it and it is the better connector if you want to do anything other than charging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If they co-developed it, why did it take the EU forcing them to switch to it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they wanted to stick with their lightning ecosystem for iPhone

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read: they wanted to make money by being a huge pain in the dick

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

To a certain extent, yes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because when they switched from the 30 pin connector to lightning, everybody bitched and moaned about it. So they promised they’d keep lightning for a decade. It’s been 11 years.

But I’m sure if they’d broken their promise and switched earlier, everyone would have been understanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Literally yes. Obstinance is not a virtue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Because you can make more money when you abuse your market position to sell overpriced cables.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because ports work better in some instances than others? Why don’t we just use rj45 for all our data transfer instead of USB? This has got to be one of the weirdest arguments I’ve seen around usb c v lightning.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a stupid comparison because of the size of RJ45 plugs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It really isn’t. The lightning port is less than half the size of a USB C port. 6.7x1.5x6.7mm compared to 8.4x2.6x6.65mm. That’s 67.335 square millimeters vs 145.236 square millimeters. Lightning is significantly smaller.