this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
47 points (81.3% liked)

Fediverse

17669 readers
6 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
47
Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation (nerdica.net)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation

Since what content users might want to see is quite unlikely to match which servers the admins tolerate, choosing instance on the Fediverse can be quite complicated, which is inconvenient and off-putting for new users.

For this reason, and simply that the Fediverse is stronger united, I believe defederation should ideally be reserved for illegal content and extreme cases. If Fediverse platforms would allow instances to simply block the rest for users by default, the user experience would be the same, unless they decide otherwise.

@fediverse #fediverse #defederation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (19 children)

This would likely lead to a lot of content only cached for the 1% of users which change that default which would be quite inefficient for the instance. Not to mention that most admins and mods would likely not see that content so they can not judge the legality of that content (or other reasons to defederate instead).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Not to mention the big reason to defederate isn't just the subs on an instance.

It's users of that but instance getting free reign on posts from other instances to troll or spread hateful bullshit.

OPs "solution" doesn't do anything about that, which why they're wrong and is defederation is better.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)