this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
857 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45751 readers
2006 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
857
6÷2(1+2) (programming.dev)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It's about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it's worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I'm probably biased because I wrote it :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Both of those screenshots, the input is a fraction, thereby removing the ambiguity. But when you use the division symbol, an ambiguity arises. This is why you should never, for any reason, use a division symbol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Division doesn't mean fraction. Division is 2 terms, a fraction is 1 term. Terms are separated by operators and joined by grouping symbols. If you change the division to a fraction you change the number of terms and change the answer (and you also would've just done division before brackets, which violates the order of operations rules).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

...he literally used the ÷ operator in the top screenshot. WolframAlpha interprets it as synonymous with /.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When putting in ambiguous inputs to WolframAlpha, it does its best to interpret it so that it's can give an answer, and it shows you underneath how it interpreted it. That doesn't mean there wasn't any ambiguity to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right. I'm saying both / and ÷ are ambiguous in that context. WA interprets both symbols as having equivalent meaning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

WA interprets both symbols as having equivalent meaning

The wrong meaning. It interprets them both as a fraction bar, thus giving the wrong answer.