this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
74 points (68.0% liked)

Memes

45578 readers
1229 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Biden sucks... but vote for him. I mean the two party system sucks, first passed the post sucks, gerrymandering sucks... but the republican party sucks even more. I'd rather have a dottering old liberal than an outright fascist, and at the same time the system won't be reformed because of an election cycle. People need to organise, get off their lazy butts. But since you ain't doing that, there's only one thing to do.

Vote Biden. Don't be dumb. It's like the only sane alternative, no matter how insane that sounds.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You know, when Biden took office the capitol building had literally just been attacked by a violent mob who smeared shit on the walls. And we were still in covid-lockdowns, and gas was $4 a gallon, and Ukraine had just started getting attacked.

Idk why Biden gets so much shit, but given where he started, I think we are doing a damn fine job and our inflation numbers are much better than most of the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

If inflation is our metric, then Democrats have been in agreement with Republicans ever since the Nixon Shock.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

People of Gaza are so lucky that it's the lesser of the two evils facilitating their genocide.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I honestly dread to think what Trump would have done.

Lessor of two evils sucks balls, but you can still minimise the damage at least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump would've done the exact same thing. You're not minimizing any damage your regime is facilitating a literal genocide. The fact that you're keep trying to minimize this fact because it's your fascist in office shows how utterly morally bankrupt you are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The immediate response to the war would probably have been the same, but another 4 years of Trump would have meant more time to inflame tensions in the region even worse with actions such as:

  1. Moving the US embassy to Jerusalem
  2. Withdrawal from the Iran deal
  3. Assassination of Iranian generals

Etc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Biden has continued all the same policies and has also dragged the world into a proxy war against Russia while continuing to escalate tensions with China. Biden is a lunatic whose actions continue to bring the world closer to a world war.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure it was literally Russia who started that war.

Edit: Sorry, meant to say 'special operation'. This is how states operate now. It fucking sucks. It all fucking sucks. Everyone fucking suck. Throwing shit at each other is no way it's going to stop. People need to pull their heads out of their ass as point fingers at the people who actually put this shit together. The entire world economy is tired to oil and guns. As long as oil and guns reign supreme, so will war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even Ukrainians are now saying that it was the west that stopped negotiations last March https://www.aaronmate.net/p/ukraines-top-negotiator-confirms

Meanwhile, Stoltenberg finally admitted that the reason the war started was because of NATO expansion https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_218172.htm#:~:text=The%20background%20was%20that%20President,condition%20for%20not%20invade%20Ukraine

Meanwhile, people who put this all together are the ones running the empire, and as long as Americans keep voting for the lesser evil nothing's going to change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, Stoltenberg finally admitted that the reason the war started was because of NATO expansion

Your link does not support that. It literally states that Putin wanted to completely veto NATO expansion, which he has no right to do. In retaliation for not caving to his absurd demands, he declared war on Ukraine. All of this are actions by Putin and could only have been prevented by Putin. He started the war, nobody else.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Stopping NATO expansion would be an absurd demand if Russia did not have the power to stop do so by force which is what it's now doing. Russia gave NATO a choice of either stopping expansion to its borders, or resolving the situation by force. NATO chose to resolve the situation by force. The whole narrative that Putin started the war and nobody else is beyond infantile because it just ignores all the history and geopolitical context pretending as if this was some random event that happened out of the blue and for no logical reason.

NATO has maintained a policy of might makes right since the fall of USSR, it has invaded and razed numerous countries over the past few decades, and now it's run into a country that will no longer tolerate an aggressive military alliance on its borders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

NATO chose to resolve the situation by force.

NATO did not fire a single shot during this war. Russia was the one who started all the shooting. Not to mention that Ukraine is a sovereign nation that gets to choose if it wishes to associate with NATO. Russia decided to use force to prevent Ukraine from doing that.

There is no history or geopolitical context here that justifies Putins invasion of Ukraine. To claim anything else is an endorsement of Putins flavour of fascism, where he is literally saying that Russian might makes right. It's insane how deluded you are to literally draw the opposite conclusion from facts that do not support your arguments at all.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The whole point of a proxy war is that you use somebody else to do the fighting for you. Meanwhile, Ukraine lost its sovereignty back in 2014 when a democratically elected government was overthrown in a western backed coup. Painting this as Ukraine freely choosing to associate with NATO is the height of intellectual dishonesty.

Meanwhile, bleating about justifications is just a distraction from the reality of why the war happened. Pretty hilarious of you to run around calling others deluded while spewing utter nonsense. One thing that's abundantly clear here is that you don't care one bit about the actual facts. You're an ideologue regurgitating propaganda you've memorized.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, Ukraine lost its sovereignty back in 2014 when a democratically elected government was overthrown in a western backed coup. Painting this as Ukraine freely choosing to associate with NATO is the height of intellectual dishonesty.

You are ignorant of the facts. The democratically elected Ukrainian parliament adopted a treaty for closer association with the EU, which Yanukovich tried to block. After sending snipers to fire at protestors against his deeply unpopular decision, the Ukrainian parliament voted by a large majority to remove Yanukovich from his post. There is no evidence of Western involvement here, and the only nation that spoke of a "coup" was Russia, as Putin lost his ally in Yanukovich. All of this happened through democratic votes, by a democratically elected governing body.

And one of the first things the interim government did? Hold new elections. How did Putin respond? By sending in troops and illegally occupying Crimea. And in Donetsk and Luhansk the pro-Russian separatists tried everything to disrupt the elections and deprive the Ukrainians there of their democratic right to vote.

Had Yanukovich decided not to send in snipers, the protests would have happened without bloodshed. Had Putin decided not to send in troops, there would not have been bloodshed. Every single time the decision to use violence was taken by Putin or one of his allies.

You're an ideologue regurgitating propaganda you've memorized

Rich coming from someone who only regurgitates Russian talking points verbatim.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you think that's any comfort to the Palestinians Biden is helping to genocide?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What's that? Somebody thinks that a different president is going to stop the drones and bombings!? Like they're not tied up in deals?! Like if a third party candidate won the process would just magically stop?!?!

Bush made the bombs drop, Obama made the bombs drop, Trump made the bombs drop, Biden made the bombs drop... wtf do you think the next president will do? The CIA tells them what's what and that's it.

Vote Biden, or get a republican president. Your call.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I know. This was clapback to all those who think the notion of voting third party does anything else but taking away votes from the democrats. It's naive, it's dumb, it's quite frankly ignorant. Change in power dynamics happens from the ground up, not the top down.

Just calling a spade a spade.