Technology

37716 readers

463 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

351

Pluralistic: “If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing” (pluralistic.net)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

216 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

using definitions of terms that the rest of the world doesn't agree with.

Like which one exactly?

Ever read the message at the beginning of a rip? You know, the one with the FBI logo on it. Remind me what it says?

There is none. Some rips used to come with a "Ripped by [some nick]" and a scene group logo, but they've grown out of fashion.

Just kidding, I know you meant this one: https://youtu.be/CXca40Z01Ss

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Like which one exactly?

"people who were not going to pay" is not one singular group, but you use this as if everybody who isn't going to pay is part of the same demographic. Some people won't pay because they don't want it in the first place. Some people won't pay because while they want it, they can't afford it. And some won't pay but will take it anyway because they feel entitled to it.

Painting all these groups with the same brush is disingenuous at best, and intentionally deceptive at worst.