this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
160 points (85.4% liked)

Technology

59010 readers
4700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Thats a fun thought experiment at least. Is there any way for an AI to gain physical control on its own, within the bounds of software. It can make programs and interact with the web.

Some combination of bank hacking, 3D modeling, and ordering 3D prints delivered gets it close, but i dont know if it can seal the deal without human assistance. Some kind of assembly seems necessary, or at least powering on if it just orders a prebuilt robotic appendage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

inhabiting a boston dynamics robot would probably be the best option

i’d say it could probably use airtasker to get people to unwittingly do assembly of some basic physical form which it could use to build more complex things… i’d probably not count that as “human assistance” per se

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

inhabiting a boston dynamics robot would probably be the best option

Already been done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djzOBZUFzTw

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I fucking love it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

i think this is the perfect time for the phrase “thanks i hate it”

load more comments (7 replies)