this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
98 points (86.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21160 readers
1532 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    98
    Ram usage on windows compared to Linux (yewtu.be)
    submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
    32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    For those who couldn't read the Linux GUI:

    • Windows used 3.4 GB / 8GB
    • Linux used 800 MB/ 8 GB
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I don't get why this is always mentioned. Windows caches too and uses up all free space for faster application startup, but just because it also does it doesn't change the fact that it uses more ram for active processes while doing nothing. I remember Minecraft running a lot better on my old MacBook with just 4gb of ram as Ubuntu used less than Mac OS X and I could allocate more to the game, whether cacheing was enabled or not on those OSes was not relevant. This should not be relevant today as 32gb of ram can be purchased for less than 100 bucks but sadly is as Apple and other laptop manufacturers think selling soldered 8gb is ok for a base model in 2023 for a laptop costing more than 300 bucks

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I've never owned a laptop that didn't have upgradeable RAM.

    I also don't pay for Apple products so that might be why. Vote with your wallets and stop buying their overpriced metal bullshit.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    The ancient MacBook in question has a firmware limitation and thus only supports 4gb, it was already upgraded from 2gb iirc (black 2007 MacBook 3,1). My current laptop has 16gb soldered, too bad that the hinge will die again before the ram becomes insufficient

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Holy crap that's a long lived laptop.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

    I’m still using my 2014 MBP as a daily driver. They’re surprisingly long lasting. Only thing I’m rolling with still that’s older is a Lenovo X220 that I use to play a starship bridge simulator with haha.