this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
24 points (92.9% liked)

Privacy

37933 readers
1696 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is something I can't figure out, because my understanding is that no matter what OS you install, unless you bought your Mac with cash, your serial number and credit card are now connected...and will always be spilling data about you.

Thanks for any advice...I'm wondering if it's worth it to install a new OS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can think of plenty of reasons, e.g. NSA, or any US institution interested in intelligence gathering, paying for it.

But why would the do it in hardware when they can do it in software? Again, the number of people running Asahi Linux is minuscule.

I dunno about such an exposure tanking their stock. Sure, some privacy advocates would be disappointed, but most Apple users would shrug it off. I doubt a significant percent of people using Apple products are doing it because of privacy concerns. And what are those people going to do? Switch to Microsoft? If they were ever going to switch for privacy reasons, or had any willingness to switch to Linux, they probably already would have. But it's all speculation, because getting statistics on this would be almost impossible. My opinion is, it might make a temporary blip in their stock price, but there'd be no enduring impact on their bottom line. Adding hidden telemetry to their chips, however, would add significant cost to every chip.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because software is easier to analyze than hardware?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Certainly, although OSX has enough closed source parts, and obfuscation is good enough to let a supply chain attack live in Go's module ecosystem for years. Obfuscation is reasonably effective, especially when the DMCA in the US makes reverse engineering legally hazardous, and it's iffy in the EU as well. Anyone who found an issue would have to make it public very anonymously.