this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1136 points (98.6% liked)

People Twitter

6969 readers
2371 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Suicides in women in the 1950s and 1960s were actually lower than what they were in the 1980's, so this is a bullshit comparison tweet, where the 1970s happened to have the highest rate and the tweeter is putting a causation to the numbers that may not even have direct causation. I could just as easily claim that vehicle fuel economy improving during the 70's caused a decrease in female suicides.

Female suicides hit its lowest at around 2000 before trending upwards again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And then VTEC kicked in yo, and female suicides skyrocketed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Lol. Right? What was that, like 1997? VTEC makes women kill themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While I can't necessarily disagree with your correlation≠causation argument...

I could just as easily claim that vehicle fuel economy improving during the 70's caused a decrease in female suicides.

Better gas mileage probably contributed a more than zero amount to that decrease.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You could very well be right, but it's just impossible to control for such variables, so we can't say one way or the other with a degree of certainty. Especially considering that a 20% swing in numbers consists of a mere 1 or 2 people per 100,000 difference.