236
Pakistan to respond ‘forcefully’ to India’s ‘act of war’, says prime minister after attack – live
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
236 points (99.2% liked)
World News
35801 readers
583 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
India reusing the oldest false flag playbook in the world as an excuse to start a war.
I haven’t been paying attention. Is the militia attack on the resort the one that’s fake? Who’s saying that?
Blaming Pakistan for it without any evidence is most definitely fake. India is clearly looking for a reason to start a war.
https://ddnews.gov.in/en/five-terrorists-including-three-from-pakistan-identified-in-pahalgam-terror-attack/
All is this all propoganda ? All news media is fake?
Nothing is true?
I think you don't want to accept pakistan sponsors terrorist which have attacked india.
Where was bin laden found ? Also India targeted only terrorist grounds.
Straight up from Israel playbook, bomb stuff and declare them as terrorist facilities without a single piece of evidence.
India killed multiple children.
What were children doing in terrorist training camps? Who trafficked them there? Why does Pakistan government not know about the kids in terrorist camps?
Because they are not terrorist camps and India bombed civilians.
Ah, crazy Indian forces. They either bomb Pakistani forests, or civilians, never terrorist camps that they have intel on.
Perhaps Pakistan would like cooperate when Indian govt investigates it. Civilians, after all. Nothing sensitive?
Crazy Indians forces with the concentration camp in Kashmir which they promised autonomy and then unilaterally violated their promise.
Tourists of Pakistan always hear local fairy tales. But they can't tell the real status of Kashmir they have made 'azad' from India, anf then sold to China like a medieval feudal lord from Mohammad's era.
Can you respond to my claim is it true yes or no?
Instantly changing the subject when human rights violations are brought up reminds me of another Apartheid.
Which particular claim?
Did India Promise Kashmir autonomy and then unilaterally violated their promise yes or no?
Both India and Pakistan took away autonomy from all princely states under their control respective control. I don't see any reason to single out one Princely state.
If you have any logical principle which singles out Kashmir, but not any of the others, please state.
You seem to know awfully little about Kashmir for someone so willing to bat for the Indian government. Doing the both-sides thing like the other Apartheid defenders when getting called out.
What is article 370 and what happened in 2019?
You need to answer my preceding post if the pretense that this is a rational discussion from your side has to continue.
No proof it was a false flag. This is nonsense, and worse, it is despicable, insensitive nonsense. Lashkar e Toiba is a Pakistani terrorist group. Ajmal Kasab (one of the terrorists in the 2008 Mumbai attacks) had a relative who fought in the Afghanistan as a Mujahideen, and he was trained in similar camps in Pakistan. Bin Laden was found near a Pakistani military academy. David Headley claimed the Pakistani intelligence agency was involved in the Mumbai attacks. The attack in Pahalgam was evidently done by Pakistan, as it doesn't fit the pattern of indigenous Kashmiri militants. Even in the height of militancy, tourists were not targeted as it alienated the business class and local Kashmiris reliant on tourism. This was an implicit agreement. What's more, Kashmiris came out in huge numbers condemning terrorism for the first time on the streets. You show your ignorance again.
India claims to have hit terrorist bases. Pakistani media has already started spreading fake news. It's best to wait it out as propaganda and emotionally charged lies meant to provoke both sides will start pouring in. So stop spreading lies.
So, an organization not affiliated to the government broke the law and that gives India the right to break treaties and start military aggressions against that government?
according to the Rules Based International Order (tm) yes
Just like USA attacked stronghold of Osama Bin Laden which was in a country far far away (can't remember which country), India is just sorting out known terrorist training camps in its neighbourhood.
I suppose it was equally illegal for USA to kill Osama in (can't remember which country).
Exactly. So it's still not justified
It is justified. Another matter that the justification doesn't respect sovereignity of Pakistan - just like Pakistan army doesn't respect its democracy.
Did you read what I wrote? Pakistan has covertly supported terrorism. Pakistan did not share intelligence with India during the Mumbai attack. Independent intelligence from other countries confirmed Pakistan's role in the attacks.
India did not target any Pakistani military sites. It claims to have targeted LeT and Jaish e Mohammed bases. Pakistan still shields many internationally recognised terrorists.
You're naive if you think Pakistan is 'governed'. It is a military masquerading as a government. Again, read. Maybe look up the Mumbai attacks and Pakistan's role in them. Look up how Hizbul Mujahideen foiled indigenous Kashmiri militant groups like the JKLF and ratted them out to the Indian army because they weren't loyal enough to Pakistan. It's an inter imperialist conflict. Class war doesn't play out on the country level. I don't support war, or warmongering.
So you're from lndia or Pakistan ??
Why do you think Pakistan had something to do with it? You have provided no evidence. India has been occupying and surpressing Kashmir for decades. You really think those Kashimiris have no reason to get radicalized?
Are you from Pakistan ?
Are you from India?
I am
Great can you tell Modi to stop occupying Kashmir.
Where are you from ??
I think you need a good read of this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
Where is the evidence that Pakistan was behind the Kashmir attack it is not in there.
https://ddnews.gov.in/en/five-terrorists-including-three-from-pakistan-identified-in-pahalgam-terror-attack/
Was Egypt behind October 7 too?