this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
707 points (99.6% liked)
Memes
9991 readers
852 users here now
Post memes here.
A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.
An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.
- Wait at least 2 months before reposting
- No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), [email protected] can be better place for that
- Use NSFW marking accordingly
Laittakaa meemejä tänne.
- Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
- Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. [email protected]
- Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He is 13 and his wiki page has an early life section. ☠️
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Gronk
to be fair, it doesn't have many sections at all, so this checks out 😄
Madden San Miguel
June 4, 2012 (age 12) Frisco, Texas, U.S.
Theres a lot to unpack from lil Gronks info there.
12yo and already have a "controversies" section on the wiki page.
I mean, good? Make mistakes. Be a kid. It's just kinda fucked it's all being documented for posterity
So, a 13-year-old with brain damage.
Baby Gronk is an actual person? I thought it was people making fun of baby yoda with a silly name.
If this isn't a sign of the decline in Wikipedia I don't know what is. Like it's not even his channel it's his dad's.
Why would that be a sign of wikipedia's decline?
Should they not document a famous figure? It doesn't matter whether it's ridiculous or not, value judgement is not an encyclopedia's place to do
He's not a famous figure, he's a child being exploited by his dad, and even on the page itself there's nothing actually notable about the kid himself. It's mostly salacious "controversy" about his gross no-name dad.
And actually encyclopaedias generally and Wikipedia particularly engage in value judgement all the time. Who is or isn't a notable public figure, what is or isn't a reliable source, etc.
Nothing about this child merits a Wikipedia entry. Maybe Encyclopedia Dramatica or Kiwi Farms or something else for the bottom feeders, but not a site that's supposed to be for general human knowledge. GTFO with that.