“I recall Midwestern summer nights, standing on my grandparents’ hushed lawn,” Ray Bradbury told me in 2010, “and looking up at the sky at the confetti field of stars. There were millions of suns out there, and millions of planets rotating around those suns. And I knew there was life out there, in the great vastness. We are just too far apart, separated by too great a distance to reach one another.”
For the young Bradbury, who would grow up to make that great vastness feel, to many, as almost as tangible as home, there was one celestial body more captivating than any other: Mars.
Mars: The fourth planet from our sun, some 140 million miles from us on average. The only planet in our solar system, other than our own, deemed by scientists and stargazers over the centuries to be—possibly, at one time—hospitable to life.
The planet has been part of our collective imagination for centuries, from the tales of ancient mythology, to H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds, to David Bowie’s The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders of Mars. Ray Bradbury may have been yet another in a long line of artists dreaming about Mars, but he was the first science fiction writer to elevate the planetary tale beyond the marginalized gutter of “genre fiction,” with his 1950 story cycle The Martian Chronicles.
While Bradbury’s 1953 novel Fahrenheit 451 is often cited as his crowning achievement, it was The Martian Chronicles—arguably a superior work—that put his name on the literary map. The Martian Chronicles was published by Doubleday 75 years ago, on May 4th, 1950. Until that point, science fiction had been mostly dismissed by the firmament as “kids’ stuff,” littered as it was with pulpy tropes such as ray guns, little green men, and scantily clad damsels in distress. But The Martian Chronicles subverted all that, addressing a range of vital, vexing, timeless societal themes in the midst of McCarthy era America: nuclear war, genocide, environmental destruction, the rise of technology, corporatization, censorship, and racism.
Lamentably, these themes still tower over us in the Trumpian zeitgeist all these years later, but their continuing relevance only underscores the point: The Martian Chronicles is a serious book about serious human themes. It is science fiction as a reflection of modernity. The writing is exquisite, showcasing Bradbury at the dizzying height of his poetic prowess, lyrical, rich in metaphor, pastoral, with stunning passages of seemingly effortless prose, eschewing the occasionally purple passages of certain other works, like Something Wicked This Way Comes, and the more dialogue driven polemics of Fahrenheit 451. It hits the sweet spot between poetic exposition and complete narrative originality. With its publication, Ray Bradbury, not quite 30 years old, had pulled off a tour de force magique—he had created literary science fiction, and the intelligentsia quickly took notice.
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)
Literature
5546 readers
12 users here now
Pretty straightforward: books and literature of all stripes can be discussed here.
If you're interested in posting your own writing, formal or informal, check out the Writing community!
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From the title, I thought the article was about Edgar Rice Burroughs' Mars series, aka Barsoom (1911 onwards). Calling those "kids' stuff" or implying that's how they were viewed feels pretty elitist all on its own; they were pulpy, sure, but still considered reading for adults. It feels kind of like the author wanted to concoct a reason to discount the much earlier sci-fi work(s) from having been "serious", so any consideration it was given (which at the time, was pretty significant) could be ignored in favor of handing Bradbury the credit.
Books are not required to address one's personal list of important themes to qualify as "serious".
No, he had continued in the footsteps of Burroughs and even moreso Wells. If you don't measure your own interests by the level of recognition that "intelligentsia" (i.e. critics who deride anything but the stuffiest non-scifi, non-fantasy fiction as "kids' stuff") give it, you'll have a much better reading experience.
Yawn. This genre gatekeeping is neither useful nor enlightening. There are still plenty of stuffy, self-important critics today who dismiss sci-fi and fantasy as "kids' stuff", so it's not like Bradbury put those bad opinions to rest for sci-fi, just as Tolkien did not for fantasy. Chasing the approval of people who otherwise despise a genre should not be the goal for works of that genre.