this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
152 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

47694 readers
1367 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aside of these signs and the address numbers, the building is completely unmarked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Here's my favourite warning, can you guess what it is?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

Holy shit fours on blue AND yellow, AND it's an oxidizer? My guess is some kind of halogenation agent, likely fluorine based. The lack of flammability with those stats makes me think it's an inorganic compound, probably some wretched fluorine abomination.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like it would definitely not have a 0 in red?

But it was a great read and I'm glad you posted it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Oxidizers aren't typically flammable themselves and only react with fuels.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Chlorine trifluoride! Nasty, NASTY shit. Guess which industry I worked in as safety!

Edit: I remembered this quote about ClF~3~ from John D. Clark's book "Ignition!" and wanted to share. For the non-scientists, hypergolic means it'll ignite on contact with another substance without an outside energy source, like a spark.

It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that’s the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water-with which it reacts explosively. It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals-steel, copper, aluminium, etc.-because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminium keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

Yeah it basically is, also while it's not flammable itself, it makes almost everything it touches ignite. Even the very unburnable things

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wikipedia screenshot of hazards of chlorine trifluoride, showing hazard symbols for explosive, corrosive, tozic and carcinogenic with the word "Danger" below it

I think "Danger" might be putting it lightly...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hah! You get two signal words with GHS: caution or danger. Caution is low stakes, where you might get skin irritation or maybe a mild burn. Danger is supposed to clue you in that it will fuck you up, but there's no indicator of magnitude of fuck you up. Will it just give you a bad burn or will it melt your skin off while intercalating with your DNA?

I always wanted a third "oh helllll no" category for the really awful substances. For things like tert-Butyl hydroperoxide (it's a straight 4-4-4) or Osmium tetroxide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Same dude. Like signal word "Fuck" for the spiciest of chemicals that really probably shouldn't exist in the first place that are desperately trying not to exist

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

If I'm to understand [email protected] correctly, it's something that's:

Extremely hazardous,
non flamable, Extremely unstable, Reactive to water

And if ox means oxidising, reacts to exposure to oxigen.

I thought Lithium, but that catches fire and this is non-flammable.

I haven't a clue what this could be, but now I'm curious.