World News

32285 readers

793 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

209

Demand for uranium for reactors seen jumping 28% by 2030 (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nuclear capacity is expected to rise by 14% by 2030 and surge by 76% to 686 GWe by 2040, the report said

This is only good news if it displaces thermal coal and gas generating stations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most studies suggest that a 100% renewable source of our energy needs is completely viable. That should be our goal. It’s much easier and cheaper to aim for that - what benefit would nuclear give? It’s just much more expensive for all the downsides.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/100%25_renewable_energy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

given that you are so confident of this can you explain how a 100% intermittant grid deals with a two week dunkleflaute? Im keen to know what the solution is given that storage to cover that for the uk currently (without electrifling transport or heating) would cost in excess of a trillion dollars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As I said in my comment, yes 100% renewable is possible but adding a bit of nuclear make it easier to achieve and cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Nope, it will make it harder and more expensive.