this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
7 points (88.9% liked)

New York Times gift articles

809 readers
141 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20498531

The financial part of the article is why we're seeing extensive adoption in rural locations, where people depend on propane, but not in urban areas which are hooked up to the methane distribution system. Getting universal adoption is going to require making electricity cheap and providing support for the appliance switch itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Also, they reduce indoor air quality, with likely adverse health effects. And while the old resistance-based electric cooktops suck, induction is a completely different technology which works better than gas. Switching to induction is a no-brainer.

[–] nobody158 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

One problem with induction is the cost. And the cost of wiring in the plug for it.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It is still expensive up front, though you can get out of the additional wiring by using a 120v+battery model.

Fuel costs for stoves are fairly small though compared with space heating and water heating.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 3 weeks ago

IKEA sells portable benchtop single-pot induction cooktops, at least in 220V Europe. Not sure if they’re viable with a 110V mains supply, though.

load more comments (3 replies)