this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
-4 points (45.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

33252 readers
490 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm being serious. I think that if instead of Trump there was just a prompt "engineer" the country would actually run better. Even if you train it to be far right.

And this is not a praise of LLMs...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm. That is interesting, and I admit it does seem like the company that made it is also still researching their own model, but some parts of the article seem a bit dramatic (not sure if there is a better word).

Like when it says the model doesn't "admit" to how it solved the math problem when asked. Of course it doesn't, it is made for humans to interact with so it is not going to tell a human how a computer does math, it makes more sense for it to explain the "human" method.

Interesting stuff though, thanks for the article!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The wording is very sensationalist. It's currently hard to trace any single output specifically, but that doesn't mean we don't know how it works. The algorithm and theory behind it are very well understood. It's just that the algorithm is very complex (and uses very large amounts of data), which is what makes tracing a single response token by token so hard.

When you read something about how we don't understand how AI works, you can safely skip that article, they intentionally use dishonest language to make it sound like something mystical is going on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah that makes a lot more sense to me. I can definitely understand that the algorithm might be very large and complex for one person to understand, but it isn't magic.