this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
128 points (95.1% liked)

politics

22634 readers
3826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Removed for genocide denial.

The UN definition of genocide has 5 points, any ONE of which is enough to call it a genocide.

Israel has hit 5 for 5 in Gaza.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/pt/ihl-treaties/genocide-conv-1948/article-2?activeTab

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Shocker. Back to your safe space.

It's not any of those five things. It's any of those five things with intent to destroy a peoples.

South Africa is going to have a hard time proving intent at the ICJ when Hamas uses human shields to inflate civilian casualties and 99/100 Palestinians are alive.

Make your delete every post that takes a view of a highly disputed issue that you personally disagree with. The ICJ didn't grant the preliminary injunction. Going to pretend everyone agrees with you? Going to also delete the intelligence and diplomatic corps and most of the heads of state of the western world, as well?

And going to delete Wikipedia for showing pretty much both sides violated the ceasefire? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Gaza_war_ceasefire

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Wait, but didn't Bibi and many of his government publicly express intent? Such as when they called all Palestinians animals, called for nuking them, or announced they will be cutting all water and supplies... what about all of that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah why haven't they then I wonder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How many Palestinians need to die before you discover a pattern?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh there's a pattern alright. It leads directly to Hamas and their fucked up ideology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If that were true, we wouldn't be talking about Israeli snipers killing Palestinian children.

https://www.aljazeera.com/program/newsfeed/2025/1/20/palestinian-child-killed-by-israeli-sniper-despite-ceasefire

Here's a wild idea... Hamas wouldn't be able to recruit if Israel would stop killing innocent civilians.

But then, Israelis don't beliieve there are innocent Palestinians.

https://www.jns.org/the-myth-of-gazas-innocent-majority/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

They have been, since the 90s.