this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
111 points (98.3% liked)

PC Gaming

10620 readers
737 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if CAMM modules will ever take off, I've always been told the reason soldered memory exists was to cut down on latency.

now I know that's probably bullshit to some extent and more away to sell people on the higher tier SKUs

but I know moving off of existing technologies carries cost that companies might not want to bear

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

The Framework CEO said in a QA that AMD engineers did a simulation of this APU with CAMM and that they'd have to cut the memory bandwidth by half to make it work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

CAMM has been around for years at this point and I've only seen them in a couple devices so, no, I don't think so. They still can't match the speed of solder either.