Worldbuilding

1580 readers

1 users here now

Rules of !Worldbuilding:

See here for a longer, more explanatory version.

Rule 0: These are guidelines, not laws.
Rule 1: Be polite and respectful to others.
Rule 2: Provide some lore with your submissions!
Rule 3: Show some effort.
Rule 4: Do it yourself.
Rule 5: Advertising is limited.

Related Communities

For conlang (constructed languages) discussion check out [email protected] Feel free to discuss the your conlangs in our community, as well!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which type of worldbuilder are you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What drives your world? Where do you start?

Are you:

The Architect, who begins with the setting—crafting landscapes, lore, and systems until the story grows naturally from the world itself (J.R.R. Tolkien)?
The Storycrafter, who starts with a strong plot—shaping the world and characters to serve a compelling narrative arc (J.K. Rowling)?
The Psychologist, who builds from the inside out—creating vivid, complex characters whose choices shape the world and drive the story (George R.R. Martin)?
The Philosopher, who begins with a theme—exploring big ideas and moral questions through a world built to embody and test them (C.S. Lewis)?
The Engineer, who uses mechanical systems as a world scaffold - building characters, stories, and lore to support and explore those systems (Brandon Sanderson)?

Which one best describes your process? Or do you switch between them depending on the project?

EDIT: Added The Engineer thanks to CaptSatelliteJack

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

This is a fun question. In my biggest project so far, I've been more the architect, but far too disorganised for a comparison with Tolkien. I hastily framed out the world at a glance - geography, kingdoms, a few key figures, a few suggestions of a proximal history. Then I went in with the details. Every river, every one-horse backwater, every shop and its contents, restaurants with menus, books of particular interest. Then I'd finally had enough of a sense of the place that you could watch stories start to emerge, like an overfull cauldron boiling over. Those stories got incorporated into the history. Then I decided I must know more about certain geological processes and ended up laying out planetary weather systems, so I'd know where all the rain would end up. In that way I found a network of massive underground tunnels, thereby locating the site of several underground factions and their unseen battles.

It all sounds grand, but most of what I do is very low to middling. Delusions of adequacy.