this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
1586 points (93.5% liked)

Memes

48663 readers
1843 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

My sources are newspaper articles whose sources are not the guy you're talking about.

Because the Palestinian and Bosnian genocides are not in China, they don't prove anything about China. At best they are whataboutism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Check the newspapers, Zenz will be listed. Find some sources, they all point to Zenz for claims of genocide.

As for Palestine, it isn't a whataboutism. There's overwhelming evidence of Palestinian genocide, and there just isn't for the Uyghur people.

Start with the UN report, read China's response.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The reports were made by reporters that were named and whose names weren't what you refer to.

Unless Palestine is in China, what happens or does not happen gives no privileges for China. What you're doing is indeed whataboutism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Show your sources. Claims of genocidal nature all route back to Zenz, claims of reeducation programs are abundant and have many sources.

And no, whataboutism would be saying that "China may be doing genocide, but the US and Israel are doing worse genocide in Palestine." That's not my point, my point is that the Palestinian genocide has mountains of evidence, yet the Uyghur reeducation program's "genocidal nature" only has Zenz, paid for by the BBC specifically to manufacture evidence to be used against China for geopolitical gain.