Memes

45619 readers

1001 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

888

Never has never will (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

178 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Water used for industry is still going to be used regardless of who controls that industry.

Absolutely not. Pretending that capitalism doesn't work the way capitalism works is a certain dead-end for your argument.

they just don’t have a means to act on it.

That is one piss-poor justification for the status quo.

Population growth has slowed but it has not stopped.

The people at the top aren't worried about population growth these days, Clyde - they are worried about population reversal. You wanna know why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. Pretending that capitalism doesn’t work the way capitalism works is a certain dead-end for your argument.

Wtf does that even mean?. The point is there will still be a demand for goods whether it's produced by a farm/factory owned by one individual or a collective of workers. They'll still be consuming the water.

That is one piss-poor justification for the status quo.

I'm not justifying anything. All I'm trying to do is explain to you that resources are finite and too many people will burn through them. If you don't think poor people can be greedy and wasteful then I encourage you to get out more.

The people at the top aren’t worried about population growth these days, Clyde - they are worried about population reversal. You wanna know why?

The only reason I ever hear for that is from racists because it's the white people that slowed down the most. Population projections for the world do not show a decline. Unless of course you take the lack of resources into account...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wtf does that even mean?

Pretending that production for profit and production for need is the same thing is fallacious - end of story.

All I’m trying to do is explain to you that resources are finite and too many people will burn through them.

You still haven't managed to justify the right-wing trope of "overpopulation" - pretending that the vast majority's consumption is (somehow) the problem isn't proving it, merely regurgitating it.

the white people that slowed down the most.

Sooo... you have figured out that in a capitalist society access to women's healthcare is merely another commodity - and, thanks to colonialist pillaging and repression, white people do tend to have more access to that commmodity?

You don't say.

Population projections for the world do not show a decline.

No... it shows a trend towards stabilization - which, just by itself, demoslishes the entire concept of "overpopulation."

Unless of course you take the lack of resources into account…

What lack of resources. Resources being hoarded by a capitalist elite was as true in 1950 as it was in 2023 - so how does that affect the trope you are trying to justify?